
Technology E&O in California
California Civil Code § 1668 bars a contract from directly or indirectly exempting a party from responsibility for its own fraud, willful injury to another’s person or property, or violation of law, whether willful or negligent. In August 2026, the California Supreme Court applied the statute to a damages limitation in a negotiated business-to-business manufacturing agreement and held that a cap on damages for willful injury to another’s person or property is invalid. The case does not invalidate every commercial cap or decide ordinary technology-service breaches. When reviewing a California-facing agreement, separate ordinary performance limits from intentional-wrongdoing and statutory-liability language, and ask the broker what liability the policy actually insures.
What Is Tech E&O Insurance?
Technology errors and omissions coverage can help pay when a customer claims your software, hosting, installation or technology advice caused financial loss. If you provide tech products or services, check each activity; cyber incidents and unrelated professional work need separate review. Read the national Technology errors and omissions (E&O) guide.
What Should You Watch for With Tech E&O Insurance in California?
A damages cap cannot shield willful injury under the recent Supreme Court rule
In New England Country Foods, LLC v. VanLaw Food Products, Inc. (2026), the California Supreme Court held that Civil Code § 1668 invalidates a negotiated limitation on damages for willful injury to another’s person or property. The case involved a commercial manufacturing agreement and alleged intentional interference with business interests. It makes broad “all claims” caps worth close review where a dispute could plead intentional injury; it does not establish that every service cap is invalid. 2,1
The rule does not erase ordinary contract limits across the board
Section 1668 lists fraud, willful injury, and violation of law; the 2026 decision addressed a limit on damages for willful injury. A routine missed milestone, negligent implementation, or service-credit dispute is not automatically within that holding. Ask counsel to review the actual claims and governing-law clause rather than relying on a generic statement that California voids liability caps. 2,1
Invalidating a contract cap does not create insurance
A rule about what a vendor and customer may contract away does not establish that an E&O policy covers the resulting liability. Compare the customer contract’s cap, consequential-damages waiver, and carve-outs with the policy’s covered damages, contractual-liability wording, exclusions, and limits. Ask the broker to identify each difference using the actual proposed forms. 2
Which Tech E&O Insurance Providers Have California License Records?
These providers publish a national listing for Technology errors and omissions (E&O); the license records below name the licensed entities and roles. Some records rely on company-reported information rather than independent regulator verification. A national listing does not confirm the product is available in California. Check the regulator’s license lookup and confirm state availability for your business when requesting a quote.
At-Bay
At-Bay Insurance Services LLC
At-Bay’s license page lists P&C producer and surplus-lines broker license numbers for all 50 states and the District of Columbia. These are company disclosures and do not establish product availability in each jurisdiction. 20
At-Bay offers primary and excess technology errors and omissions insurance for businesses with revenue up to $5 billion.
Coalition
Coalition Insurance Solutions, Inc.
Coalition’s license page lists producer and surplus-lines licenses for Coalition Insurance Solutions, Inc. in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The page separately lists insurers; this record covers the brokerage entity only. 21
Coalition offers technology errors and omissions together with Active Cyber coverage for businesses that provide a technology product or service.
Corgi
Corgi Insurance Services, Inc.
Corgi’s company producer-license table lists 50 jurisdictions: 49 states and the District of Columbia, including DC license 3003091619. New Mexico does not appear in the table and is not included here; the omission does not establish that Corgi is unlicensed there. The company-reported table has no stated as-of date and does not establish product availability. 22
Corgi lists technology errors and omissions insurance for technology products and services.
Gallagher
Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, LLC
Gallagher Small Business’s legal-information page gives the producer identification associated with the disclosed California license. The provider record treats this identifier as company-reported and not independently verified; no other state is recorded. 23
Gallagher arranges technology errors and omissions insurance for technology businesses.
RiskCube
RiskCube Insurance Services, LLC
RiskCube’s license page, effective February 11, 2026, lists property-and-casualty producer/broker licenses in California and Delaware and names NPN 21694336. The company says it is expanding its licensing footprint; no other states are listed. 26
RiskCube arranges technology errors and omissions insurance for startups.
TechInsurance
Specialty Program Group LLC
TechInsurance’s current licensing page names Specialty Program Group LLC / SPG Insurance Solutions and lists state license numbers, but labels Rhode Island “Individual licenses” rather than identifying a license for the named agency. RI is omitted because this disclosure does not establish agency authority there; this is a search limitation, not an assertion that the company is unlicensed. The remaining state entries are company-reported and are not an insurance product availability map. 27
TechInsurance arranges technology errors and omissions and cyber coverage for technology businesses.
The Hartford
Hartford Fire Insurance Company
California DOI’s current company profile identifies Hartford Fire Insurance Company (NAIC 19682) as UNLIMITED-NORMAL for property and casualty, authorized since 7 January 1870. The source covers this insurer in California and does not map every Hartford product to an issuing subsidiary; no expiry/renewal date is shown. 28
The Hartford offers technology errors and omissions coverage through its FailSafe product.
Travelers
The Travelers Indemnity Company
California DOI’s current company profile identifies The Travelers Indemnity Company (NAIC 25658) as UNLIMITED-NORMAL for property and casualty, authorized since 17 June 2002. The source covers this insurer in California and does not map every Travelers product to this issuing company; no expiry/renewal date is shown. 29
Travelers offers technology errors and omissions insurance through CyberRisk Tech for technology and life-sciences companies.
Vouch
Vouch Specialty Insurance Services, LLC
Vouch’s licenses page, effective January 16, 2025, lists producer licenses in all 50 states and DC. Its separate surplus-lines table includes Idaho number 870820, while a footnote says Georgia and Idaho do not issue agency-level surplus-lines licenses. Because those statements conflict for Idaho, this record keeps Idaho producer-only and does not treat the table number as established agency surplus-lines authority. The page is company-reported and does not establish product availability. 30
Vouch lists technology errors and omissions among the core coverages in its technology-company programs.
Who Regulates Insurance in California?

California Department of Insurance
The California Department of Insurance regulates insurers and insurance producers, provides company and license-status searches, and accepts complaints through its Consumer Complaint Center. Its commercial-insurance guidance explains the Department’s limited jurisdiction over surplus-line insurers. 5,6,7,8,18
Surplus-Lines Tax and Stamping Office in California
Reported tax rate. 3% of taxable premium when California is the insured's home state 9,11,16,8,10,12,13,14,17
When California is your home state, the surplus-line broker tax is generally 3% of gross premiums less returned premiums. Ask the broker to show the home-state determination, taxable premium and any applicable exception; ordinary multistate reporting does not itself reduce the tax base. A broker generally must search the admitted market unless a California exemption or the qualified federal commercial-purchaser exception applies. CIGA does not protect claims under a surplus-line policy.
Surplus Line Association of California
- California usually requires an admitted-market search: Before most nonadmitted placements, a broker must search among admitted insurers. After a public hearing and the required statutory findings, California’s Commissioner may exempt qualifying coverage or risks through an Export List order. The confidential written report remains required under §1763.1. Separately, §1763(h) waives the search for a commercial insured meeting California’s §1760.1(b) definition: the broker must first give written disclosure about possible admitted-market availability and its potential greater protection and oversight, then receive the insured’s written request for nonadmitted placement. The broker must ensure eligibility, with a safe harbor for reasonable reliance on information supplied in good faith. The federal exempt-commercial-purchaser route under §8205 has its own §8206 definition and requires disclosure about possible admitted-market availability and its potential greater protection and oversight, followed by the purchaser’s written request. Ask which route and eligibility criteria the broker relies on. 10,13,14,3,4,19
- Separate tax calculation from allocation reporting: Section 1775.5 generally counts the entire premium for nonadmitted insurance placed in one transaction with one underwriter or group for a California-home-state insured. It has a separate interstate-motor-transit formula and exclusions for premiums on insurance placed by or through a special-lines surplus line broker under §1760.5 and the defined risk-financing portion of specified Superfund remediation products. CDI’s calendar-year 2025 instructions include policy-related fees in gross premium, say it does not collect the tax on risks outside the United States, and treat multistate allocation percentages as informational. Have the broker explain how those rules apply to your placement. 11,15,16
What Should You Ask Before Buying Tech E&O Insurance in California?
- Does the customer contract’s liability cap expressly apply to intentional wrongdoing, statutory violations, fraud, or only ordinary contract and negligence claims?
- Does the cap’s carve-out language match the risks your technology services create, including deliberate misuse of customer data or intentional interference with customer operations?
- Can the broker compare the contract’s promise to pay or reimburse damages with the policy’s actual definition of covered damages and contractual-liability exclusion?
Tech E&O Insurance in California: Frequently Asked Questions
Does California invalidate every limitation-of-liability clause in a business technology contract?
What kind of contract did the California Supreme Court review?
New England Country Foods involved a negotiated commercial manufacturing contract with a damages limitation and allegations of intentional interference with the other company’s business. The Court answered a certified legal question about willful injury under § 1668. 2
Tech E&O Insurance Guides for Other States
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Other coverage in CaliforniaEvery coverage guide for California, plus the regulator and surplus-lines details.






