CFC vs
Lockton: How Do They Compare for Business Insurance?
CFC provides specialist technology policies; Lockton offers technology brokerage, customer-contract review, international program design and claims advocacy.
An Overview of CFC and Lockton
A startup negotiating a large customer contract may need policy terms and a separate adviser to review contractual requirements. CFC’s technology materials include breach-of-contract features; Lockton markets contract review and claims support. Choose CFC for specialty technology coverage; choose Lockton for contract review or an international program. 2 31
What Stands Out About CFC and Lockton?
CFC at a Glance
- Eligible technology businesses can combine E&O, cyber, media/IP and general liability. 2CFC US-facing materials, accessed 16 September 2026; company descriptions, not an issued policy or independent service assessment.
- Cyber policyholders may get threat monitoring, alerts and 24/7 incident support. 7CFC US-facing materials, accessed 16 September 2026; company descriptions, not an issued policy or independent service assessment.
Lockton at a Glance
- Lockton brokers help businesses arrange insurance, employee benefits and retirement programs. 30,42,49Company-reported US brand and Terms of Business. The contracting Lockton company can differ by client. Private-ownership and independence claims are marketing statements, not a regulatory finding.
- Technology clients can compare options for cyber, D&O, liability, property and benefits with Lockton. 31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39Direct US product and industry pages accessed 16 September 2026. Technology errors and omissions is discussed in educational Lockton articles but was not added from those articles alone. Catalogue entries from the private-equity page are marketed in that industry context.
CFC vs Lockton Coverage Lines Compared
A listing may be arranged through an insurer or partner. “Not listed” means we have no separate offering page for it; ask the provider whether it can quote the coverage and request the policy terms.
CFC and Lockton Coverage, Line by Line
Open what CFC and Lockton each publish for one coverage line.
Commercial Property Insurance
Crime Insurance
Cyber Insurance
D&O Insurance
Employment Practices Liability Insurance
Fiduciary Liability Insurance
General Liability Insurance
Product Liability Insurance
Professional Liability (E&O) Insurance
Representations and Warranties Insurance
Umbrella and Excess Liability Insurance
CFC and Lockton Reliability Scores
Each score uses the criteria for that provider’s role. Providers with more than one role may have a score for each.
CFC Reliability Scores
No Reliability Score
Lockton Reliability Scores
CFC and Lockton Review Scores for 2026
These averages can combine ratings for different products, locations, and customer groups, including approximate BBB grade conversions. Read each review for its sources, what it covers and how the score is calculated.
CFC Review Score
Review Score
No reviews found
The reviewed sources did not yield customer reviews of CFC; the available survey concerns UK brokers. The one rating we found is from UK brokers: 4.76 out of 5 in Insurance Times’ 2024/25 survey.
Read CFC reviewsLockton Review Score
Review Score
3 rated sources
Lockton’s reviews vary by office and entity. Local Google-derived ratings provide some service feedback, but no reliable firmwide verdict.
Read Lockton reviewsKey Differences Between CFC and Lockton
Contract Review Should Lead to Identifiable Policy Requirements
CFC’s application asks about the applicant’s products, services and contracts. Its brochure is a product description, not a determination that a particular indemnity is insured. Lockton describes contract review within its technology practice, alongside cyber, D&O and international program design. The practical deliverable to request is a written mapping from customer requirements to proposed coverage and unresolved obligations. 3 2 31
Lockton’s shared catalogue should not be stretched into a finding about a specific technology E&O form: its record deliberately excludes educational articles as standalone product proof. Ask the proposed team which technology E&O product it would actually place. CFC’s brochure can then be compared with that form, rather than with Lockton’s entire list of brokerage services. 31 32 1
Claims Advocacy and Incident Response Have Different Jobs
Lockton describes claims consulting that includes policy mapping, claim presentations and discussions with insurer representatives. CFC markets cyber monitoring and technical incident response, alongside claim-notification channels. A buyer may value both functions. Ask each firm to name who handles technical containment versus coverage advocacy versus system restoration, since these are service descriptions rather than measured claims outcomes. 40 7 8
An Adviser’s Mandate Does Not Establish Authority to Bind
Lockton’s terms say it is generally not authorized to bind insurers except in circumstances it seeks to disclose, and do not guarantee placement on acceptable terms. Its contact route is an inquiry, while CFC’s technology submission runs through a broker. Set deadlines around an actual binder and effective date, not a submitted form or an adviser’s willingness to review the contract. 42 41 3
The same engagement should identify compensation. Lockton discloses commissions and negotiated fees, potentially together, with further compensation categories. CFC’s reviewed public documentation leaves buyer-facing charges undisclosed. Neither establishes a standard cost for this negotiation or placement. 42
Request premium, taxes, fees and intermediary pay in a written breakdown; CFC’s reviewed US technology materials do not disclose a buyer-specific price, commission rate or full charge schedule. 2,3,6Only the listed US technology and broker-process sources; no inference of free service or zero commission. Australian and unrelated Irish CFC disclosures are not US pricing evidence.
What Should You Confirm in CFC and Lockton Quotes?
- Which contract clauses require amendments, endorsements or uninsured risk acceptance, and who will document that analysis?
- Which broker, insurer and California placement route apply, and who has binding authority before the customer deadline?
- Who handles technical response versus coverage advocacy, and what fees, commissions and service limits govern that work?
CFC vs Lockton Services Compared
What each provider says about the services you may need
Sources for CFC vs Lockton
Comparisons Related to CFC vs Lockton
CFC describes specialist technology underwriting and cyber-response services through an MGA route; AIG lists broader commercial options submitted through brokers and agents.
Compare AIG’s carrier group with Lockton’s technology and commercial brokerage for businesses building a broader risk program.
Alliance Risk brokers a broad range of commercial coverage; CFC sells technology products and cyber response through brokers; its reviewed management-liability offer excludes California-domiciled businesses.




