AIG vs
CFC: How Do They Compare for Business Insurance?
CFC says it can quote specialist technology cover as an MGA and offers risk-response services, while naming separate U.K. and U.S. entities in its disclosures. AIG identifies affiliated insurers but does not assign an issuer to a particular quote. Compare the legal insurer, application requirements, incident services and notice terms for the actual policy.
An Overview of AIG and CFC
CFC positions itself as a specialist MGA for technology risks and describes security and incident-response services alongside insurance. AIG’s public pages list a broader commercial portfolio and affiliated insurers, but do not establish which product or insurer fits your technology account. Ask both producers to identify the policy form, legal insurer and any included cyber-response services before comparing price. 20 16 2
The coverage table also lists an AIG Product Recall offer, but the cited flyer describes multinational cover for named segments; it does not establish an unrestricted U.S. standalone offer, issuer or account terms. Confirm that your product and territory fit the actual proposal. 12
What Stands Out About AIG and CFC?
AIG at a Glance
- Brokers and agents can use AIG’s North America portal for loss runs, policy documents, applications and tools. 4Publicly listed North America broker/agent portal functions and U.S. producer appointment requests. Authenticated workflow and product-specific submission or binding steps were not reviewed.
- For certain property and casualty lines, insureds and brokers can report claims online and track adjuster assignment and closure, depending on country. 5AIG's stated IntelliRisk claim portal functions for named primary property/casualty lines. This does not describe every commercial line, claim outcome, or policy obligation.
CFC at a Glance
- Eligible technology businesses can combine E&O, cyber, media/IP and general liability. 17CFC US-facing materials, accessed 16 September 2026; company descriptions, not an issued policy or independent service assessment.
- Cyber policyholders may get threat monitoring, alerts and 24/7 incident support. 22CFC US-facing materials, accessed 16 September 2026; company descriptions, not an issued policy or independent service assessment.
AIG vs CFC Coverage Lines Compared
A listing may be arranged through an insurer or partner. “Not listed” means we have no separate offering page for it; ask the provider whether it can quote the coverage and request the policy terms.
AIG and CFC Coverage, Line by Line
Open what AIG and CFC each publish for one coverage line.
Commercial Property Insurance
Crime Insurance
Cyber Insurance
D&O Insurance
Employment Practices Liability Insurance
Fiduciary Liability Insurance
General Liability Insurance
Kidnap and Ransom Insurance
Management Liability Insurance
Media Liability Insurance
Product Liability Insurance
Product Recall Insurance
Professional Liability (E&O) Insurance
Representations and Warranties Insurance
Tech E&O Insurance
Umbrella and Excess Liability Insurance
AIG and CFC Review Scores for 2026
These averages can combine ratings for different products, locations, and customer groups, including approximate BBB grade conversions. Read each review for its sources, what it covers and how the score is calculated.
AIG Review Score
Review Score
2 rated sources
Customer ratings for AIG are low: Trustpilot shows 1.9 out of 5 from 252 reviews, and NerdWallet gives 2.5 stars and notes more claims complaints than expected. These pages cover many AIG products and countries, so they only loosely describe business insurance.
Read AIG reviewsCFC Review Score
Review Score
No reviews found
The reviewed sources did not yield customer reviews of CFC; the available survey concerns UK brokers. The one rating we found is from UK brokers: 4.76 out of 5 in Insurance Times’ 2024/25 survey.
Read CFC reviewsKey Differences Between AIG and CFC
Provider Role and Technology Audience
“AIG” is the marketing name for American International Group, Inc.'s worldwide operations. AIG says insurance products are written or provided by subsidiaries or affiliates; its U.S. legal notice lists multiple U.S.-domiciled property and casualty insurers but does not identify which company would issue a particular commercial policy. 1,2AIG group naming and the listed U.S.-domiciled property and casualty companies. The legal notice is not a policy-specific carrier assignment or complete ownership chart.
CFC can quote specialist cover as an MGA, meaning it performs some underwriting functions for insurers that carry the risk. Its disclosures identify CFC Underwriting Limited and U.S. producer CFC USA, Inc.; the CFC brand is not the insurer name on every policy. 20,19CFC US-facing materials, accessed 16 September 2026; company descriptions, not an issued policy or independent service assessment.
CFC describes an MGA that performs some underwriting functions for insurers and identifies CFC Underwriting Limited and CFC USA, Inc. in its disclosures. AIG’s U.S. insurer list also spans affiliates without assigning one to the proposed policy. Confirm the U.S. producer, delegated authority and risk-bearing company on the quote and binder. 19 2
AIG’s Surplus Lines section says its commercial insurance solutions serve small, middle-market, and large enterprises. The same section separately describes Lexington Casualty as an experienced excess-and-surplus-lines casualty provider; it does not explicitly assign all three customer-size segments to Lexington Casualty. 3AIG’s published Surplus Lines section; customer-size statement and Lexington Casualty description are adjacent but not explicitly attributed to the same business. This does not establish a provider-wide customer focus or product-specific issuer.
Startups through multinationals can ask CFC about technology coverage, including before generating revenue; the stated audience does not guarantee a particular business will qualify. 16CFC US-facing materials, accessed 16 September 2026; company descriptions, not an issued policy or independent service assessment.
CFC says technology buyers can range from startups to multinationals, including pre-revenue firms, but that audience statement is not a promise of acceptance. AIG’s broad size range does not establish technology-specific eligibility. Give each underwriter the same information about revenue, products, security controls, contracts and prior incidents. 16 3
Application and Renewal Service
AIG lists a North America myAIG portal for brokers and agents to access loss runs, policy documents, applications, and tools, and a separate U.S. portal for producer appointment requests. The public pages do not establish that a business can complete an online purchase or bind coverage directly. 4Publicly listed North America broker/agent portal functions and U.S. producer appointment requests. Authenticated workflow and product-specific submission or binding steps were not reviewed.
A senior staff member should expect to complete the technology application and send it to a broker; it asks for revenue, funding, subsidiaries, products, contracts, security, IP procedures and claims history. CFC Connect separately supports broker trading and appointments. 18,21CFC US-facing materials, accessed 16 September 2026; company descriptions, not an issued policy or independent service assessment.
CFC’s technology application asks a senior staff member about revenue, funding, products, contracts, security, intellectual property and claims history; CFC Connect separately supports broker trading. AIG’s portal page describes broker and agent tools but does not publish the submission checklist for a selected line. Ask who completes each form and what documents are required before the quote is considered complete. 18 21 4
AIG lists its North America broker portal as a place for brokers and agents to access loss runs, policy documents, applications, and tools. The page does not explain how renewals are managed or promise renewal terms or timing. 4Public description of a North America broker/agent portal; authenticated functions and account-specific availability were not reviewed.
Agree on renewal timing, certificate turnaround and account support before choosing CFC; reviewed materials do not specify those commitments for California technology buyers. 21,18CFC US-facing materials, accessed 16 September 2026; company descriptions, not an issued policy or independent service assessment.
AIG lists broker access to documents and loss runs, without specifying renewal commitments on that page. CFC’s reviewed material does not set renewal timing or certificate turnaround for California technology buyers. Confirm the account contact, renewal calendar and service commitments rather than inferring them from portal access. 4 21 18
Cyber Incident and Claims Support
AIG says insureds and brokers can report primary property or casualty claims online for Auto Liability, General Liability, Property, and Aerospace, attach documents, and track adjuster assignment and claim closure. AIG says options vary by line and country. 5AIG's stated IntelliRisk claim portal functions for named primary property/casualty lines. This does not describe every commercial line, claim outcome, or policy obligation.
Cyber buyers can get threat monitoring, alerts, a response app and round-the-clock technical incident support according to CFC; check the proposed policy for access, scope and conditions. 22CFC US-facing materials, accessed 16 September 2026; company descriptions, not an issued policy or independent service assessment.
CFC describes threat monitoring, alerts, a response app and round-the-clock technical incident support for cyber buyers; verify access conditions in the proposed policy. AIG’s IntelliRisk page describes reporting and tracking for named primary property and casualty lines, with features varying by line and country. Compare response services separately from insurance limits and claim-payment obligations. 22 5
You can report a claim through CFC’s form, email or phone; cyber incidents also have a separate phone route and app. These are notification channels, not a promise about payment speed or outcome. 23CFC US-facing materials, accessed 16 September 2026; company descriptions, not an issued policy or independent service assessment.
The CFC channels listed for notification include a form, email or phone, with separate routes for cyber incidents. These are contact methods rather than a promise about payment speed. For AIG, confirm whether the selected line and country are supported by the portal; for either policy, follow the notice clause and consent requirements. 23 5
What Should You Confirm in AIG and CFC Quotes?
- Which legal insurer will issue the policy, and which entity has authority to quote and bind it? 19 2
- What technology application, security documentation and renewal timeline does the underwriter require? 18 4
- Which monitoring and incident-response services are included, and what notice or consent steps apply to a cyber claim? 22 23 5
AIG vs CFC Services Compared
What each provider says about the services you may need
Sources for AIG vs CFC
Comparisons Related to AIG vs CFC
Alliance Risk publishes technology-focused broker routes and quote preparation; AIG describes broader commercial segments and broker-facing policy tools.
AIG is an insurance group whose products use issuing affiliates; Amelia Risk describes a broker-led process for finding and comparing insurer quotes.
Compare AIG’s insurer group with Aon’s middle-market brokerage and commercial risk placement process.





