CFC vs Risklytics: How Do They Compare for Business Insurance?

CFC sells specialty technology policies through brokers; Risklytics prepares and reviews submissions for frontier-tech companies, but its California route is unconfirmed.

An Overview of CFC and Risklytics

A robotics founder combining software, hardware and customer-site work may need help describing operations before insurers quote. Risklytics prepares and reviews the application; CFC’s application requests detailed operating information. Choose Risklytics for complex robotics or AI submissions; choose CFC for a specialty technology policy when its state route is available. 31 30 3

What Stands Out About CFC and Risklytics?

CFC at a Glance

  • Eligible technology businesses can combine E&O, cyber, media/IP and general liability. 2Company-reportedCFC US-facing materials, accessed 16 September 2026; company descriptions, not an issued policy or independent service assessment.
  • Cyber policyholders may get threat monitoring, alerts and 24/7 incident support. 7Company-reportedCFC US-facing materials, accessed 16 September 2026; company descriptions, not an issued policy or independent service assessment.

Risklytics at a Glance

  • Risklytics says it prepares an application from your business description and website for you to review. 30Company-reportedCurrent official service description; not independently tested or a policy entitlement.
  • Risklytics says it checks technology E&O wording for AI exclusions before binding. 37Company-reportedCurrent official service description; not independently tested or a policy entitlement.

CFC vs Risklytics Coverage Lines Compared

CoverageCFCRisklytics
Commercial propertyListed 13CFC offers property coverage within its property and casualty product.Listed 33Risklytics arranges commercial property insurance for robotics, hardware and AI businesses.
CrimeListed 11,23CFC offers crime in its US management-liability package for eligible organizations outside California, excluding US publicly traded companies.Not listed
Cyber liabilityListed 9CFC offers cyber insurance, including primary and excess products.Listed 33Risklytics arranges cyber insurance for robotics, hardware and AI businesses.
Directors and officersListed 11CFC offers directors and officers liability in its US management-liability package for eligible organizations outside California, excluding US publicly traded companies.Listed 33Risklytics arranges directors and officers liability insurance for robotics, hardware and AI businesses.
Employment practices liabilityListed 11CFC offers employment practices liability in its US management-liability package for eligible organizations outside California, excluding US publicly traded companies. CFC does not write standalone employment practices liability.Not listed
Fiduciary liabilityListed 11CFC offers fiduciary liability in its US management-liability package for eligible organizations outside California, excluding US publicly traded companies.Not listed
General liabilityListed 13CFC offers general liability within its property and casualty product.Listed 33Risklytics arranges general liability insurance for robotics, hardware and AI businesses.
Intellectual propertyListed 14CFC offers intellectual-property insurance for eligible businesses with revenue up to $500 million, depending on industry.Listed 33Risklytics arranges intellectual property insurance for robotics, hardware and AI businesses.
Kidnap and ransomListed 15CFC offers kidnap and ransom insurance, including a specialist marine product.Not listed
Management liabilityListed 10,11CFC offers a US management-liability package for eligible organizations outside California, excluding US publicly traded companies.Not listed
Media liabilityListed 21CFC offers media liability insurance for content creators and media businesses.Not listed
Product liabilityListed 22CFC offers product liability within its life-science and nutraceutical policies.Not listed
Product recallListed 16CFC offers product-recall and contaminated-product-recall insurance.Not listed
Professional errors and omissions (E&O)Listed 12CFC offers professional liability insurance for professional-service businesses.Not listed
Representations and warrantiesListed 17CFC offers buyer-side and seller-side representations and warranties insurance.Not listed
Technology errors and omissions (E&O)Listed 2CFC offers technology errors and omissions for technology businesses.Listed 33Risklytics arranges technology errors and omissions insurance for robotics, hardware and AI businesses.
Tools, equipment and inland marineNot listedListed 33Risklytics arranges inland marine equipment coverage for robotics, hardware and AI businesses.
Umbrella and excess liabilityListed 18CFC offers excess professional liability, general liability and cyber limits for small and micro businesses.Listed 33Risklytics arranges umbrella insurance for robotics, hardware and AI businesses.
Virtual care and telehealthListed 19CFC offers an eHealth package for businesses delivering health care through technology, including telemedicine.Not listed
Workers’ compensationNot listedListed 33Risklytics arranges workers’ compensation insurance for robotics, hardware and AI businesses.

A listing may be arranged through an insurer or partner. “Not listed” means we have no separate offering page for it; ask the provider whether it can quote the coverage and request the policy terms.

CFC and Risklytics Coverage, Line by Line

Open what CFC and Risklytics each publish for one coverage line.

CFC and Risklytics Reliability Scores

Each score uses the criteria for that provider’s role. Providers with more than one role may have a score for each.

CFC and Risklytics Review Scores for 2026

These averages can combine ratings for different products, locations, and customer groups, including approximate BBB grade conversions. Read each review for its sources, what it covers and how the score is calculated.

CFC Review Score

-/ 10

Review Score

No reviews found

The reviewed sources did not yield customer reviews of CFC; the available survey concerns UK brokers. The one rating we found is from UK brokers: 4.76 out of 5 in Insurance Times’ 2024/25 survey.

Read CFC reviews

Risklytics Review Score

-/ 10

Review Score

No reviews found

Risklytics has no public customer reviews or ratings that we found, so there is no Review Score. That isn't a bad sign, just not enough to judge.

Read Risklytics reviews

Key Differences Between CFC and Risklytics

Application Preparation Still Requires the Founder’s Factual Check

Risklytics says it uses the business description and public information, including the company website, to draft an application for review and signature. CFC asks about products, hardware installation, managed services, contracts, financial information and claims. A marketing website may not describe every deployment or contractual duty, so the useful output is an accurate submission the founder can verify, not merely a faster form. 30 3

Risklytics says it reviews technology E&O wording for AI exclusions before binding. That is a described brokerage service, not evidence that a particular AI failure will be insured. CFC’s technology product similarly cannot be assumed to cover every AI or robotics operation from its general technology audience. Ask for explicit treatment of the actual use case in the offered policy. 37 1

A Placement Catalogue Does Not Establish Access to a Particular Underwriter

Risklytics directly advertises placement of technology E&O, cyber, D&O, property, equipment, workers’ compensation, IP and other lines. Its terms contemplate insurers and wholesale brokers, but the reviewed sources do not name a specific issuer or prove CFC access. CFC is an MGA with its own broker route. It is possible to evaluate a brokerage mandate and a CFC proposal separately without assuming a relationship between them. 33 32 5 6

For a Bay Area applicant, an earlier gate remains unresolved: California is absent from Risklytics’ reviewed agency-license table. That is not proof it cannot arrange coverage, but the responsible California-authorized producer and placement route were not established. CFC discloses a California producer identity, while its specific technology eligibility and issuer remain open. These are different gaps in what we could find and should be answered separately. 31 32 4

Placement Updates Do Not Establish Emergency Claims Support

Risklytics advertises Slack/email placement updates and an ongoing broker relationship. Its reviewed service and legal pages do not establish a dedicated claims-reporting procedure or detailed assistance commitment. CFC publishes claims channels and a cyber response service. A founder should request a written loss-reporting plan covering broker, insurer and response vendor, especially where an incident could involve both physical injury and technology failure. 30 35 32 8 7

What Should You Confirm in CFC and Risklytics Quotes?

  • Who verifies the application’s hardware, AI, customer-site and contractual descriptions before signature, and which exclusions remain?
  • Which California-authorized producer, wholesaler if any, and insurer will handle the placement, with evidence of their roles?
  • What compensation and policy fees apply, and who must be contacted after a cyber event, injury or product failure rather than a routine placement update?

CFC vs Risklytics Services Compared

What each provider says about the services you may need

CriteriaCFCRisklytics
Business role

CFC can quote specialist cover as an MGA, meaning it performs some underwriting functions for insurers that carry the risk. Its disclosures identify CFC Underwriting Limited and U.S. producer CFC USA, Inc.; the CFC brand is not the insurer name on every policy. 5,4Company-reportedCFC US-facing materials, accessed 16 September 2026; company descriptions, not an issued policy or independent service assessment.

Risklytics arranges commercial insurance for frontier-technology businesses; its disclosures identify Risklytics, Inc. dba Risklytics Insurance Services as producer, not insurer. 31,32Company-reportedCompany legal disclosures, including live terms section 2. Producer authority is company-reported, not regulator-verified.

Application process

A senior staff member should expect to complete the technology application and send it to a broker; it asks for revenue, funding, subsidiaries, products, contracts, security, IP procedures and claims history. CFC Connect separately supports broker trading and appointments. 3,6Company-reportedCFC US-facing materials, accessed 16 September 2026; company descriptions, not an issued policy or independent service assessment.

Risklytics says it drafts your application from your business description and public website for your review and signature; it also advertises Slack and email updates, but the process was not independently tested. 30Company-reportedCurrent official service description; not independently tested or a policy entitlement.

Risklytics says it reviews your application, approaches insurers and explains quote wording; the insurer binds only after you accept, and timing varies by risk. 35Company-reportedFAQ process description only; no application, quote or binding transaction performed.

Availability

California buyers should confirm product eligibility and current license authority before applying: CFC reports all-state producer licenses and surplus-lines authorization in four states, including California. It identifies CFC General Insurance Agency, Inc. as its California licensing name; this disclosure was not independently checked. 4Company-reportedCFC US-facing materials, accessed 16 September 2026; company descriptions, not an issued policy or independent service assessment.

California-domiciled businesses should look elsewhere for the described management-liability product, and standalone EPL is also listed as declined. This restriction applies to the January 2026 brochure’s offering, not every CFC product. 11Company-reportedCFC US-facing materials, accessed 16 September 2026; company descriptions, not an issued policy or independent service assessment.

Ask CFC for a current California eligibility answer before spending time on a technology application; reviewed pages do not establish the route for a particular startup. A 2023 admitted Tech E&O announcement does not supply a current product schedule. 1,2,3,29Not found in reviewed sourcesCalifornia technology-product access only. General producer authorization is separate from product eligibility. No live quote or state filing was obtained.

Verify the current producer authority for your location: Risklytics publishes NPN 22311838 and selected state licenses, but these company-listed identifiers are not independent verification or proof of product access. 31Company-reportedAbout page attributes its table to NIPR; no NIPR producer report or regulator-issued record was obtained.

California is absent from Risklytics’ reviewed license table; this does not prove it cannot arrange coverage, so confirm the producer, authority and insurer before relying on a quote. 31,32,40Not found in reviewed sourcesOfficial company disclosures and initial CDI business-name search interface reviewed. No completed CDI search or license result. Office location and a fictional homepage demonstration mentioning CA do not establish authority.

Claims assistance

You can report a claim through CFC’s form, email or phone; cyber incidents also have a separate phone route and app. These are notification channels, not a promise about payment speed or outcome. 8Company-reportedCFC US-facing materials, accessed 16 September 2026; company descriptions, not an issued policy or independent service assessment.

Get the policy’s claim contact and Risklytics’ post-loss role before binding because reviewed pages do not establish a detailed claims process. 32,35,36Not found in reviewed sourcesScoped to reviewed service and legal pages; no inference that assistance is unavailable or that claims handling is good or poor.

Updated . Spot, a product of Tools for Enlightenment, publishes this research and works in the commercial insurance market. The comparison applies the same criteria to both providers. Editorial policy. To suggest a correction, contact Spot with the page URL and supporting source.

Comparisons Related to CFC vs Risklytics

  • CFC describes specialist technology underwriting and cyber-response services through an MGA route; AIG lists broader commercial options submitted through brokers and agents.

  • Compare AIG’s commercial insurer offerings with Risklytics’ brokerage for frontier-technology businesses.

  • Alliance Risk brokers a broad range of commercial coverage; CFC sells technology products and cyber response through brokers; its reviewed management-liability offer excludes California-domiciled businesses.

All Comparisons

Get Help With Insurance Buying and Renewals.

Get help buying coverage and managing renewals, with less paperwork for your team. Create your account and submit an insurance request online.

Talk to Spot