Embroker vs
Resilience: How Do They Compare for Business Insurance?
Embroker’s EMIS requires a new application, while legacy customers can renew existing management coverage; Resilience offers a focused cyber and technology E&O option.
An Overview of Embroker and Resilience
A current Embroker customer considering EMIS needs a new application, while a Resilience cyber or technology E&O proposal addresses a narrower placement. Compare the suite transition separately from a focused technology-risk quote. 9 27 30 Choose Embroker if you are considering grouped management coverages; choose Resilience if you need focused cyber and technology E&O.
What Stands Out About Embroker and Resilience?
Embroker at a Glance
- Eligible technology firms can bundle management coverage with technology E&O and cyber through one application. 919 August 2026 launch, new-business product. Company report of structure, not policy wording or proof of same-session binding.
- Technology and law-firm packages group relevant coverage options together. 17,16Current direct industry tabs. Optional hired/non-owned auto is not counted as a standalone coverage line.
Resilience at a Glance
- Technology companies can seek E&O coverage for software, hardware and technology services. 30Technology-specific professional liability; not general professional E&O or a guarantee of offered limits.
- Resilience helps prioritize financial cyber risks and track exposure across entities. 34,35Current named cybersecurity products; outcomes not independently established.
Embroker vs Resilience Coverage Lines Compared
A listing may be arranged through an insurer or partner. “Not listed” means we have no separate offering page for it; ask the provider whether it can quote the coverage and request the policy terms.
Embroker and Resilience Coverage, Line by Line
Open what Embroker and Resilience each publish for one coverage line.
Cyber Insurance
Tech E&O Insurance
Embroker and Resilience Reliability Scores
Each score uses the criteria for that provider’s role. Providers with more than one role may have a score for each.
Embroker Reliability Scores
No Reliability Score
Resilience Reliability Scores
Embroker and Resilience Review Scores for 2026
These averages can combine ratings for different products, locations, and customer groups, including approximate BBB grade conversions. Read each review for its sources, what it covers and how the score is calculated.
Embroker Review Score
Review Score
3 rated sources
Embroker’s reviews are mixed, and BBB records a complaint-response concern. The feedback is too limited to establish consistent service quality.
Read Embroker reviewsResilience Review Score
Review Score
1 rated source
There's almost nothing public to go on. G2 shows 4.5 out of 5 for Resilience, but from a single review.
Read Resilience reviewsKey Differences Between Embroker and Resilience
A Suite Transition Is a New Underwriting Decision
Technology companies can include Tech E&O/Cyber with D&O, EPL and fiduciary coverages in Embroker’s August 2026 Management Insurance Suite, selecting individual lines or a bundle. 919 August 2026 launch, new-business product. Company report of structure, not policy wording or proof of same-session binding.
Existing policyholders may renew legacy management products, but new customers use EMIS; switching requires a new application, according to Embroker. 9Launch announcement’s stated transition rules as of research date; not a renewal guarantee.
A legacy Embroker customer should ask what changes when moving to EMIS and which coverages can remain elsewhere. Resilience’s technology E&O proposal would address a focused part of that decision; its catalogue does not establish a substitute for EMIS’s D&O, employment-practices and fiduciary modules. A lower subtotal is not a comparable program price if those lines were removed. 9 27
Technology Appetite and IP Wording Need Separate Checks
Embroker’s Access technology program targets private, for-profit technology companies below $300 million in revenue, requires multifactor authentication for accounts above $5 million and excludes crypto, blockchain and cannabis businesses. Resilience states a US technology E&O appetite of $25 million–$10 billion in revenue. A funded startup below $25 million should obtain an exception answer from Resilience before comparing Tech E&O quotes; do not apply that floor to all Resilience cyber products or transfer Access criteria to every EMIS module. 11 30
Ask for the exact Tech E&O form if IP coverage matters: Embroker’s retail page lists IP infringement exclusions while its broker program advertises software-code infringement coverage, and public pages do not reconcile the difference. 12,11Retail What’s not included and FAQ versus Access Additional features. Product version and exact covered IP rights are unresolved; no conclusion of blanket IP protection or exclusion.
That unresolved difference makes a form-level review more useful than comparing a generic E&O label. Ask for the wording applicable to software-code allegations and customer indemnities on both proposals; Resilience’s product summary alone does not answer those questions. 30
A Higher Limit May Require Another Placement
If your primary Tech E&O is from Embroker, ask how to add higher limits because its retail FAQ says its excess product cannot sit above its own primary policy. 12Retail FAQ restriction; do not interpret the broker page’s 50+ primary carriers as markets Embroker shops or automatically compatible forms.
Excess coverage is a layer above an underlying policy. Resilience markets primary and excess technology E&O, but its public page does not establish compatibility with an Embroker primary. If the objective is only more limit, request confirmation that the underlying policy is acceptable before assuming either company’s excess product can supply the next layer. 12 30
Embroker’s FAQ also warns that changing brokers can affect proprietary-product renewal access. Plan the servicing handoff with the proposed placement rather than cancelling an account first. Resilience’s broker inquiry route does not resolve who will maintain the remaining Embroker policies. 4 31
What Should You Confirm in Embroker and Resilience Quotes?
Request a line-by-line expiring-to-proposed schedule: retained legacy policies, new EMIS modules, any separately placed Resilience policy and the broker servicing each. Obtain the applicable IP wording, prior-work terms and excess compatibility confirmation. Then identify the actual issuing entities and California product routes; Embroker’s named program insurers and Resilience’s Homeland alternatives are product-specific disclosures, not a universal insurer map. 9 11 13 28
Embroker vs Resilience Services Compared
What each provider says about the services you may need
Sources for Embroker vs Resilience
Comparisons Related to Embroker vs Resilience
Embroker is a broker with both retail and broker-program routes; AIG is an insurer group with producer-facing applications and policy tools.
Compare AIG’s commercial insurance offerings with Resilience’s cyber insurance and separate cybersecurity services.
Moving from an existing E&O policy to Embroker's EMIS requires a new-business application; Alliance Risk reviews the current program.




