Corgi vs
Harper: How Do They Compare for Business Insurance?
Corgi packages technology startup coverage; Harper brokers complex operations, including security-guard work.
An Overview of Corgi and Harper
A technology business adding on-site field services should disclose both software and physical operations before requesting terms. Corgi distributes startup packages through partner insurers; Harper markets specialist placements such as security-guard work and describes AI-assisted applications. Choose Corgi if you want a technology startup package; choose Harper if complex operations need a specialist broker. 2 1 31 36 8 34
What Stands Out About Corgi and Harper?
Corgi at a Glance
- Startup packages scale from pre-seed to growth, with a custom option. 2,3,6,15Company website positioning and package names; named customer stories on the customers page are testimonials, not a verified book of business.
- Use Corgi’s dashboard to adjust coverage as your company grows. 2,1Company description of post-bind servicing and cancellation. Actual endorsement terms remain in the policy. This does not establish a specific renewal guarantee or a finding that renewals are unavailable.
Harper at a Glance
- Harper targets hard-to-place businesses, including contractors, care providers, manufacturers and transportation firms. 31,36Examples of advertised appetite, not a verified customer census or eligibility guarantee.
- For workers’ compensation, Harper helps classify payroll by job and prepare for premium audits. 33,41Public payroll and audit service description; not independently tested, and state employee thresholds are deliberately not generalized.
Corgi vs Harper Coverage Lines Compared
A listing may be arranged through an insurer or partner. “Not listed” means we have no separate offering page for it; ask the provider whether it can quote the coverage and request the policy terms.
Corgi and Harper Coverage, Line by Line
Open what Corgi and Harper each publish for one coverage line.
Business Owner’s Policy
Commercial Auto Insurance
Cyber Insurance
General Liability Insurance
Liquor Liability Insurance
Medical Malpractice Insurance
Professional Liability (E&O) Insurance
Umbrella and Excess Liability Insurance
Workers’ Compensation Insurance
Corgi and Harper Reliability Scores
Each score uses the criteria for that provider’s role. Providers with more than one role may have a score for each.
Corgi Reliability Scores
No Reliability Score
No Reliability Score
Harper Reliability Scores
Corgi and Harper Review Scores for 2026
These averages can combine ratings for different products, locations, and customer groups, including approximate BBB grade conversions. Read each review for its sources, what it covers and how the score is calculated.
Corgi Review Score
Review Score
No reviews found
The reviewed sources did not yield customer reviews; the inspected Trustpilot profiles showed none. Its Trustpilot page exists but shows no reviews or rating.
Read Corgi reviewsHarper Review Score
Review Score
No reviews found
We found no customer star rating for Harper. Its Trustpilot page has 0 reviews, and BBB shows 0 customer reviews and 2 complaints.
Read Harper reviewsKey Differences Between Corgi and Harper
Software Work, Guard Operations and Eligibility
Harper’s security page names armed guards, event security and mobile patrols and discusses guard-action liability, professional negligence, equipment and vehicles. That names the operations side of the company. Ask how the offered form treats actual guard duties and use-of-force allegations, rather than assuming general liability alone addresses everything in the contract. The page is a product description, not a specimen for a named insurer. 34
Corgi’s technology offering addresses allegations that technology products or services failed to perform. If the company also sends guards to customer sites, ask Corgi to distinguish insured software work from physical services and identify any separate placement needed. Ask Harper the reciprocal question about the software product and cyber exposure. This comparison should produce a map of activities to policies, not a presumption that a technology-focused provider rejects physical operations or that a broad broker’s generic E&O covers software. 8 2 30
Both market general liability and other commercial products. The distinction is the starting focus, not a clean divide between businesses with or without physical assets. Corgi has also announced small-business product filings, but filings do not establish availability for this security operation. Have both providers confirm eligibility for the combined activities and each operating state before comparing terms. 9 34 30
Payroll Classification and Workers’ Compensation
Harper describes helping classify payroll by employee duties and preparing information for workers’ compensation audits. For a business with both developers and field staff, that creates a concrete preparation task: separate job descriptions, work locations and payroll information so the submission describes what employees actually do. The service claim does not guarantee an unchanged premium at audit. 33
Corgi’s dashboard description supports changes as a startup hires and expands, but it does not settle the classification or audit terms of a workers’ compensation proposal. Ask how that coverage will be arranged alongside technology and board protection and who owns payroll updates. Harper’s wider catalogue likewise does not imply every requested line sits with one insurer or on one renewal date. 2 1 30
Applications, AI Tools and Referral Arrangements
Harper’s AI tools are described as extracting document information, drafting messages and organizing follow-ups, with professionals and carriers reviewing final decisions. Corgi offers online and specialist-assisted purchasing. For the mixed-operation business, compare how each team checks the application’s description and resolves insurer questions; neither use of AI nor a short quote-time claim establishes better classification or coverage. 26 2
Harper’s privacy policy separately describes training its own models with customer communications and policy information, while its AI vendors’ foundation-model statements address a different use. Before providing sensitive operating documents, clarify what is requested and how it will be used. This disclosure is not evidence that Corgi uses identical terms or that either company’s controls have been independently audited. 26
If an existing agent introduces Harper, identify the arrangement. Harper Partners assigns quoting, service, renewals and claims to Harper, with a commission share paid to an appropriately licensed referring agent. Its separate wholesale offering can use a different service structure. A referral does not necessarily preserve the introducing agent as the ongoing service contact. Corgi’s direct specialist route should likewise identify who coordinates the technology and field-operation policies after purchase. 38 37 2
Binding, Insurer Status, Fees and Claims
Harper’s texts cannot bind or change insurance under its messaging terms; written confirmation from Harper and the applicable insurer is required. Corgi’s disclaimers contain a policy-and-premium condition alongside a separate temporary-written-binder provision. For a guard-service start date, obtain explicit effective-coverage confirmation and the required endorsements before relying on a text exchange or application receipt. 25 1
If the contract specifies rated or admitted insurance, identify each legal insurer. Corgi says Technology Risk Retention Group has no AM Best rating, and risk retention group (RRG) policies lack state guaranty-fund protection; its disclosed eligible admitted/partner alternatives require a separate check. Harper’s older “AAA-rated” marketing does not name a rating agency or establish the rating on this quote. Ask for current evidence from both, without treating Harper as the insurer or applying TRRG’s status to all Corgi policies. 1 20 40
Harper’s referral commission share is not a premium discount, and its reviewed sources do not publish the buyer’s fee schedule. Corgi discloses potential commissions or fees. Compare the full program cost, including workers’ compensation assumptions, vehicles, any separate software cover and payment charges. For a loss, distinguish Harper’s described brokerage advocacy from Corgi’s possible affiliated or third-party administration; neither service description proves claims quality. 38 33 40 1
What Should You Confirm in Corgi and Harper Quotes?
- One written description of all work: software functions, guard duties, armed work if applicable, vehicles and subcontracted services, with accepted activities mapped to the proposed forms. 34 8
- A payroll and audit plan: employee duties and states, estimates used, update responsibilities and the insurer’s audit provisions. 33 1
- A service-responsibility document: retail versus referral/wholesale arrangement, who answers coverage questions and who handles renewals and urgent claim notices. 38 25 1
- The contract-ready proposal: insurer status evidence, effective-date confirmation, endorsements and itemized costs for the complete operation. 25 40 1
Corgi vs Harper Services Compared
What each provider says about the services you may need
Sources for Corgi vs Harper
Comparisons Related to Corgi vs Harper
Corgi packages startup coverage through an agency and carrier options; AIG publishes a broader commercial insurer portfolio with producer-facing tools.
Harper is a commercial broker emphasizing hard-to-place businesses and an AI-assisted intake process; AIG is a broad insurer group accessed through producers.
Corgi organizes startup insurance packages by company stage; Alliance Risk reviews technology E&O as part of a broader commercial search.




