Marsh vs
Resilience: How Do They Compare for Business Insurance?
Marsh advises on technology and data-center programs; Resilience offers cyber and technology E&O with security services and lists data centers in its appetite.
An Overview of Marsh and Resilience
A data-center operator should compare property and business-interruption needs alongside cyber response, since the two proposals may cover different parts of the risk. Marsh describes data-center program advice; Resilience lists data centers in its technology appetite and offers security services. 4 36 Choose Marsh to coordinate infrastructure coverage; choose Resilience for cyber and security services.
What Stands Out About Marsh and Resilience?
Marsh at a Glance
- Marsh helps companies across industries buy insurance and manage risk, with technology specialists and a U.S./Canada middle-market path through Marsh McLennan Agency. 1,3,18,20Company-reported segmentation and industry marketing. Fortune 500 and revenue statistics on Marsh sites are not used here as independently verified. A middle-market MMA path is not proof that every early-stage Bay Area company will be accepted.
- Marsh places cyber coverage and markets large digital-infrastructure property programs; MMA also brokers executive, property, casualty and benefits coverage. 8,24,4,5,3Direct practice and product pages. Technology-page FAQs about software BOP, fidelity or commercial auto were not used as offering proof. Stratus capacity is company-stated potential access, not a bound limit for a named insured.
Resilience at a Glance
- Technology companies can seek E&O coverage for software, hardware and technology services. 36Technology-specific professional liability; not general professional E&O or a guarantee of offered limits.
- Resilience helps prioritize financial cyber risks and track exposure across entities. 40,41Current named cybersecurity products; outcomes not independently established.
Marsh vs Resilience Coverage Lines Compared
A listing may be arranged through an insurer or partner. “Not listed” means we have no separate offering page for it; ask the provider whether it can quote the coverage and request the policy terms.
Marsh and Resilience Coverage, Line by Line
Open what Marsh and Resilience each publish for one coverage line.
Cyber Insurance
Tech E&O Insurance
Marsh and Resilience Reliability Scores
Each score uses the criteria for that provider’s role. Providers with more than one role may have a score for each.
Marsh Reliability Scores
No Reliability Score
Resilience Reliability Scores
Marsh and Resilience Review Scores for 2026
These averages can combine ratings for different products, locations, and customer groups, including approximate BBB grade conversions. Read each review for its sources, what it covers and how the score is calculated.
Marsh Review Score
Review Score
2 rated sources
Marsh’s global Trustpilot profile has a poor 1.3/5 score. Treat it as a service warning to investigate with your proposed team; it does not isolate US commercial accounts.
Read Marsh reviewsResilience Review Score
Review Score
1 rated source
There's almost nothing public to go on. G2 shows 4.5 out of 5 for Resilience, but from a single review.
Read Resilience reviewsKey Differences Between Marsh and Resilience
Keep Property Capacity Out of the Cyber Comparison
Marsh’s Stratus exchange markets operational property capacity for digital infrastructure. Its launch description covers property capacity only, not an equivalent cyber capacity offering. Resilience’s advertised cyber limits belong to a different coverage discussion. A large property placement number cannot be compared with a cyber policy maximum as a measure of overall protection. 5 35
Marsh’s data-center practice also describes equipment breakdown, business interruption and technology E&O. Ask the adviser to distinguish a physical interruption from a cyber-triggered outage in the proposed forms, including supplier dependencies. Resilience’s security and cyber descriptions can inform that layer, but do not complete the physical property analysis. 4 35 40
Identify the Broking Segment and Engagement
Marsh’s US guide distinguishes core broking, MMA and other channels. Those service paths should not be collapsed into one startup onboarding promise. Ask which team accepts the account and whether the proposed scope includes marketing a Resilience option; neither record establishes that account-specific access. 18 20 37
The Marsh record also preserves inconsistent Inc./LLC entity names in public disclosures. Obtain the contracting producer and current California authority in the engagement. Resilience’s Ocrea and Homeland disclosure identifies US roles but leaves the product’s California route to be confirmed. 17 19 34
Advocacy and Compensation Follow the Actual Arrangement
Marsh describes cyber claims advocacy, including preparing proof of loss with forensic accountants. Resilience describes incident coordination and a dedicated claims manager. If both participate, allocate the technical response, loss quantification and coverage-dispute work before a loss. Marsh does not pay claims itself, and neither service guarantees a recovery. 9 38
Marsh’s compensation rules differ between core US broking and MMA, including contingent compensation. Resilience’s reviewed pages do not disclose a standard fee scale. Request the account-specific broking agreement and separate insurance/security costs instead of applying a group-wide compensation label. 18 42
What Should You Confirm in Marsh and Resilience Quotes?
Ask for a lender-requirement coverage map, the actual property and cyber issuers, the engaged Marsh segment and a written scope for claims work. Price brokerage, specialty placement and technical services separately. Confirm any Resilience access and California placement basis before treating the two services as an available combined solution. 4 18 34
Marsh vs Resilience Services Compared
What each provider says about the services you may need
Sources for Marsh vs Resilience
Comparisons Related to Marsh vs Resilience
Compare AIG’s insurer group with Marsh’s segmented brokerage and risk-advisory routes for a growing or complex business.
Compare AIG’s commercial insurance offerings with Resilience’s cyber insurance and separate cybersecurity services.
Marsh offers technology-sector advice and professional-liability placement; Alliance Risk's E&O review considers major contracts and customer concentration.




