At-Bay vs
Risklytics: How Do They Compare for Business Insurance?
Software companies seeking combined technology E&O and cyber can consider At-Bay; robotics and autonomy firms needing frontier-tech brokerage can approach Risklytics.
An Overview of At-Bay and Risklytics
A company selling autonomous software should confirm appetite against its actual product before relying on a general technology label: At-Bay offers combined Tech E&O and cyber through brokers, while Risklytics describes brokerage for AI and autonomy businesses. 2 6 15 Choose At-Bay if combined technology E&O and cyber fit your software risks; choose Risklytics if an AI or autonomy operation needs broker-led application support.
What Stands Out About At-Bay and Risklytics?
At-Bay at a Glance
- Combine technology E&O and cyber protection in one policy. 2Product highlights, not an issued policy or universal contract coverage.
- Eligible policyholders get monitoring, training and cyber-advisor access; managed detection and response costs extra. 7Current service descriptions and footnotes; no claims of effectiveness or independent testing.
Risklytics at a Glance
- Risklytics says it prepares an application from your business description and website for you to review. 14Current official service description; not independently tested or a policy entitlement.
- Risklytics says it checks technology E&O wording for AI exclusions before binding. 21Current official service description; not independently tested or a policy entitlement.
At-Bay vs Risklytics Coverage Lines Compared
A listing may be arranged through an insurer or partner. “Not listed” means we have no separate offering page for it; ask the provider whether it can quote the coverage and request the policy terms.
At-Bay and Risklytics Coverage, Line by Line
Open what At-Bay and Risklytics each publish for one coverage line.
Cyber Insurance
Tech E&O Insurance
At-Bay and Risklytics Reliability Scores
Each score uses the criteria for that provider’s role. Providers with more than one role may have a score for each.
At-Bay Reliability Scores
Risklytics Reliability Scores
At-Bay and Risklytics Review Scores for 2026
These averages can combine ratings for different products, locations, and customer groups, including approximate BBB grade conversions. Read each review for its sources, what it covers and how the score is calculated.
At-Bay Review Score
Review Score
2 rated sources
At-Bay’s public review evidence is thin: one old G2 review and a BBB complaint record. It is not enough to judge day-to-day service or claims handling.
Read At-Bay reviewsRisklytics Review Score
Review Score
No reviews found
Risklytics has no public customer reviews or ratings that we found, so there is no Review Score. That isn't a bad sign, just not enough to judge.
Read Risklytics reviewsKey Differences Between At-Bay and Risklytics
Resolve the Appetite Version Before Drawing a Conclusion
The At-Bay record retains an older appetite PDF listing autonomous AI among restricted classes, but explicitly warns against treating it as current eligibility guidance. Its current product page advertises different limits and revenue ceilings, with lower ceilings for the broker-platform route. Risklytics' frontier-tech focus is also not insurer approval. Give underwriting an exact product description and request the current applicable appetite, including whether the submission needs manual handling. 12 2 17
A Combined Policy and a Broker Review Are Different Purchases
At-Bay describes technology E&O combined with cyber, including coding failures and certain contractual exposures subject to policy terms. Risklytics says it reviews AI exclusions and seeks insurer options across a broader commercial catalogue. These could be complementary roles, but no At-Bay access through Risklytics is established in the shared inputs. Obtain the proposed forms and market access confirmation rather than assuming a relationship. 2 21 16
Separate Security Charges from Placement Charges
At-Bay Stance access is tied to an Embedded Security Fee and Endorsement; optional managed detection and response is a separate security purchase. Risklytics advertises no additional brokerage fee while recognizing carrier charges and placement compensation. Those disclosures concern different costs. Request the full insurance and security invoice, and ask which tools or monitoring obligations are necessary for the quoted terms. 7 18 16
What Should You Confirm in At-Bay and Risklytics Quotes?
- Obtain a current underwriting response for the autonomous activity, not a conclusion drawn from either the legacy restriction or the current broad technology heading. 12 2 15
- Identify the California route and issuer. At-Bay publishes producer and surplus-lines identifiers but leaves account eligibility unresolved; Risklytics' California placement is likewise unconfirmed. 5 2 15
- Clarify security fees, optional MDR, renewal enrollment and incident-response contacts before accepting the program. 7 6 8 19
At-Bay vs Risklytics Services Compared
What each provider says about the services you may need
Sources for At-Bay vs Risklytics
Comparisons Related to At-Bay vs Risklytics
At-Bay publishes cyber, technology E&O and professional-liability routes with security services; AIG lists broader commercial products and broker tools.
Compare AIG’s commercial insurer offerings with Risklytics’ brokerage for frontier-technology businesses.
At-Bay's technology E&O discusses service-credit claims and separate Stance security services; Alliance Risk reviews technology contracts and existing coverage.




