Marsh vs Pie Insurance: How Do They Compare for Business Insurance?

Pie focuses on workers’ compensation with payroll-based billing and an annual audit; Marsh can coordinate workers’ compensation with broader casualty lines.

An Overview of Marsh and Pie Insurance

If payroll varies over the year, Pie’s payment model and year-end audit may be relevant to your workers’ compensation costs. A business that also needs other casualty lines can ask Marsh to coordinate those policies through a broader brokerage. 50 51 27 Choose Pie for payroll-based workers’ comp; choose Marsh to coordinate multiple casualty lines.

What Stands Out About Marsh and Pie Insurance?

Marsh at a Glance

  • Marsh helps companies across industries buy insurance and manage risk, with technology specialists and a U.S./Canada middle-market path through Marsh McLennan Agency. 1,3,18,20Company-reportedCompany-reported segmentation and industry marketing. Fortune 500 and revenue statistics on Marsh sites are not used here as independently verified. A middle-market MMA path is not proof that every early-stage Bay Area company will be accepted.
  • Marsh places cyber coverage and markets large digital-infrastructure property programs; MMA also brokers executive, property, casualty and benefits coverage. 8,24,4,5,3Company-reportedDirect practice and product pages. Technology-page FAQs about software BOP, fidelity or commercial auto were not used as offering proof. Stratus capacity is company-stated potential access, not a bound limit for a named insured.

Pie Insurance at a Glance

  • Start a workers’ compensation quote online or through an insurance agent. 34,33,35Company-reportedWorkers’ compensation access for small businesses and agencies; other product pages direct buyers to quote or contact flows but do not describe the same process.
  • Pay workers’ compensation premiums based on reported payroll, with no initial deposit. 49,50Company-reportedPie’s current workers’ compensation payment pages; actual availability and policy-specific charges need confirmation in the quote.

Marsh vs Pie Insurance Coverage Lines Compared

CoverageMarshPie Insurance
Builders riskListed 26Marsh McLennan Agency (MMA), a Marsh business, arranges builders risk insurance.Not listed
Business owner’s policyNot listedListed 39Pie accepts business owner’s policy quote requests.
Commercial propertyListed 26,4,5Marsh arranges property insurance for digital infrastructure, and Marsh McLennan Agency (MMA), a Marsh business, arranges commercial property insurance.Not listed
CrimeListed 25Marsh McLennan Agency (MMA), a Marsh business, arranges commercial crime insurance.Not listed
Cyber liabilityListed 8,24Marsh arranges cyber insurance.Listed 40Pie provides access to cyber insurance quotes from carrier partners.
Directors and officersListed 11,25Marsh arranges directors and officers liability insurance.Not listed
Employee health and benefitsListed 29,22,18Marsh McLennan Agency (MMA), a Marsh business, arranges employee health and benefits programs.Not listed
Employment practices liabilityListed 12,25Marsh arranges employment practices liability insurance.Not listed
Equipment breakdownListed 4Marsh arranges equipment breakdown insurance, including for data centers.Not listed
Fidelity bondsListed 25Marsh McLennan Agency (MMA), a Marsh business, arranges commercial crime and fidelity coverage.Not listed
Fiduciary liabilityListed 25Marsh McLennan Agency (MMA), a Marsh business, arranges fiduciary liability insurance.Not listed
General liabilityListed 4Marsh arranges general liability insurance, including for data centers.Listed 42Pie arranges general liability insurance through unaffiliated third-party insurers.
Intellectual propertyListed 25Marsh McLennan Agency (MMA), a Marsh business, arranges intellectual property insurance.Not listed
Kidnap and ransomListed 25Marsh McLennan Agency (MMA), a Marsh business, arranges kidnap and ransom insurance.Not listed
Management liabilityListed 25,14Marsh arranges management liability insurance.Not listed
Media liabilityListed 25Marsh McLennan Agency (MMA), a Marsh business, arranges media liability insurance.Not listed
Professional errors and omissions (E&O)Listed 13,25Marsh arranges professional errors and omissions insurance.Listed 41Pie Insurance arranges professional errors and omissions insurance for small businesses through third-party insurers.
Surety bondsListed 4,28Marsh McLennan Agency (MMA), a Marsh business, arranges contract and commercial surety bonds.Not listed
Technology errors and omissions (E&O)Listed 4,13Marsh arranges technology errors and omissions insurance.Not listed
Workers’ compensationListed 27Marsh McLennan Agency (MMA), a Marsh business, arranges workers’ compensation insurance.Listed 35Pie Insurance offers workers’ compensation insurance for small businesses.

A listing may be arranged through an insurer or partner. “Not listed” means we have no separate offering page for it; ask the provider whether it can quote the coverage and request the policy terms.

Marsh and Pie Insurance Coverage, Line by Line

Open what Marsh and Pie Insurance each publish for one coverage line.

Marsh and Pie Insurance Review Scores for 2026

These averages can combine ratings for different products, locations, and customer groups, including approximate BBB grade conversions. Read each review for its sources, what it covers and how the score is calculated.

Marsh Review Score

5.8/ 10

Review Score

2 rated sources

Marsh’s global Trustpilot profile has a poor 1.3/5 score. Treat it as a service warning to investigate with your proposed team; it does not isolate US commercial accounts.

Read Marsh reviews

Pie Insurance Review Score

1.7/ 10

Review Score

2 rated sources

Pie’s service record raises clear concerns: elevated regulator complaints reported by NerdWallet, 1.7/5 on Trustpilot and an F from BBB. Investigate billing, cancellation and complaint handling before buying.

Read Pie Insurance reviews

Key Differences Between Marsh and Pie Insurance

Payroll Billing Does Not Eliminate the Audit

Pie describes several payment plans, including pay-as-you-go based on reported payroll, and requires an annual premium audit. The final premium can therefore differ from the initial estimate. MMA’s casualty engagement can include program and risk-management services, but its scope must be agreed. Ask who collects employee classifications, subcontractor records and payroll updates rather than assuming the payment method completes that work. 50 51 27

Other Lines May Use a Different Insurer

Pie’s BOP, general and professional liability offerings use unaffiliated insurers, and its cyber page describes carrier partners. Their terms and service routes should not be inferred from Pie’s workers’ compensation program. Marsh likewise needs to identify each proposed market. If the employer wants one coordinated program, ask who will manage the separate renewals and where the policies depend on different insurers or administrators. 37 40 23

Claims Reporting and Advocacy Are Different Responsibilities

Pie publishes workplace-injury reporting channels and identifies different claims-handling arrangements by state. Marsh describes acting between the business, insurer and third-party administrator to prepare and negotiate claims. Ask which party receives notice, decides coverage and assists the employer. These descriptions show different roles, not which one handles claims better or guarantees an outcome. 52 53 10

What Should You Confirm in Marsh and Pie Insurance Quotes?

Request California and other-state acceptance for the actual class codes, the issuing insurer, claims administrator and audit instructions. Pie’s published state totals differ, so use the current proposal rather than a national count. Include waiver, payment and brokerage charges in the annual cost comparison. 43 45 48 49 18

Marsh vs Pie Insurance Services Compared

What each provider says about the services you may need

CriteriaMarshPie Insurance
Business role

Marsh’s US compensation guide states that, as an insurance broker, Marsh’s role is to facilitate placement of insurance coverage on behalf of clients. The transparency page describes determining appropriate insurers and negotiating with those insurers. Marsh is not identified in these sources as the insurer that issues or pays the policy. 18,17,2Company-reportedUS client-compensation and transparency disclosures. Affinity/Amazon administrator language is a separate program role and is not treated as the default retail relationship.

Current Marsh materials use more than one US legal name. The compensation guide (copyright 2024, Marsh LLC) refers to Marsh LLC and Marsh USA LLC entering client agreements. The transparency page instead names Marsh LLC and Marsh USA Inc. Marsh McLennan Agency is described as a wholly owned Marsh subsidiary. A 2006 California decision caption used MARSH USA, INC., dba MARSH RISK AND INSURANCE SERVICES, license 0437153. Confirm the exact contracting producer on the proposal and license documents; current California license status remains unverified. 18,17,19,20,1,31Conflicting sourcesUnresolved Inc. versus LLC naming. Affinity’s Marsh USA LLC license table is company-reported as of 8 March 2024 and is not a CDI live lookup. Brand unification in January 2026 is described as a brand change, not a change in business structure.

Small businesses can buy Pie’s workers’ compensation directly or through agents; affiliated insurers underwrite workers’ comp, while outside insurers provide some other Pie products. 34,37,35,39,40,41,42Company-reportedCurrent public Pie brand and US small-business insurance services; this describes group roles, not a promise that every product is available to every applicant.

If parent-company ownership matters, Pie Group Holdings, Inc. owns the website and is regulator-listed parent of Pie Casualty; AM Best identifies the insurer group as Pie Insurance Group. 36,56,54VerifiedWebsite ownership and the parent shown for Pie Casualty Insurance Company; no claim about voting control or every intermediate subsidiary.

Pie Insurance Services, Inc. is the producer that sells and administers policies; verify its current license in your state because Pie’s own license page is not regulator confirmation. 37,57Company-reportedProducer identity and Pie-published US license list; Wisconsin’s regulator separately identifies this entity in a 2024 administrative action.

Coverage lines

Marsh’s Cyber Insurance practice markets brokerage of cyber policies and related analytics products. Marsh McLennan Agency’s cyber page lists solution areas such as cybercrime, extortion and ransomware, media liability, network interruption and privacy regulatory defense costs. The Technology Practice’s data-center service describes programs that can include property damage, equipment breakdown, business interruption, cyber, general liability and surety for power and interconnection obligations. Stratus is marketed as an operational property exchange for digital infrastructure with potential access to up to $10 billion of property capacity on a single placement; at launch it is focused on property, with inland marine, cyber and casualty described as possible later lines. These are marketed capabilities, not a standard startup package or guaranteed limits. 8,24,4,5,3Company-reportedDirect practice and product pages. Technology-page FAQs about software BOP, fidelity or commercial auto were not used as offering proof. Stratus capacity is company-stated potential access, not a bound limit for a named insured.

Marsh’s Directors and Officers page offers D&O program design for public, private and non-profit companies. Its Employment Practices page offers EPLI, including endorsements described for firms with more than 4,000 employees and for midsize firms with 250 to 4,000 employees. Its Professional Liability page offers E&O risk-transfer design, including for technology businesses. MMA’s executive and professional liability practice lists D&O, E&O, EPL, commercial crime/fidelity, cyber, fiduciary, media, intellectual property and kidnap-and-ransom among policies it places. Endorsement headcount bands and product labels do not establish that a particular Bay Area company qualifies or that wording is equivalent across insurers. 11,12,13,25,14Company-reportedDirect Marsh F&PL expertise pages and MMA executive catalogue. Fiduciary, crime, media, IP and K&R are listed on MMA’s practice page; they were not each confirmed on a separate Marsh.com expertise URL.

MMA’s business-insurance hub links casualty, property, surety, cyber, executive and professional liability, international placements, captives and small-business programs. Its property page covers commercial property and builders’ risk. Its casualty page includes workers’ compensation. MMA and Marsh sites also market employee health and benefits consulting and placement. MMA’s compensation-guide landing page exists for 2026 but the PDF body was not fully extracted here. 23,26,27,28,29,18Company-reportedMMA solution pages. Texas-office lists and business-insurance FAQ examples were not used as nationwide catalogue proof. Small-business marketing does not establish an online instant-issue product.

Pie currently markets workers’ comp, BOP, cyber, general liability and professional liability/E&O; product pages describe typical coverage, while the policy and endorsements determine your actual protection. 35,39,40,42,41,36Company-reportedPublic US Pie pages with an explicit quote or contact invitation; educational-only topics and components of a BOP were not counted as standalone offerings.

If you need new or renewed commercial auto, look elsewhere: Pie stopped accepting new submissions December 1, 2025 and says it will issue no new or renewal policies after January 1, 2026; existing terms remain in force through expiry. 46,52Company-reportedPie’s former commercial-auto offering and legacy policies; commercial auto is intentionally excluded from the current coverage catalogue.

Use your policy and endorsements to decide what is covered; Pie says website descriptions do not change policy terms and eligibility varies by applicant and location. 36Company-reportedWebsite descriptions and US products generally; the buyer’s issued policy and endorsements control.

Application process

The public Marsh path to speak with a broker is an inquiry, not an online bind. Contact pages ask you to choose an inquiry type, including a sales or RFP route. The business-inquiry page says to complete a form and that a representative will respond within 48 hours; it points existing-policy certificate, billing and policy questions elsewhere. The inquiry page does not display premiums or bind coverage. The 48-hour response time is a company statement, not a binding or service guarantee. 15,16,21Company-reportedInspected public contact-select and business-form pages on 16 September 2026 without submitting information. MMA has a separate contact page. Inquiry is not a completed insurance application.

Marsh describes a broker-led placement: identifying insurers for the risk, negotiating coverage and price, and, in core US broking segments, disclosing quotes and premium indications received. It may share incumbent or competing insurer names, pricing objectives, expiring terms, or give an insurer a last look when it believes that is in the client’s interest or the client instructs it. Those market practices are disclosure statements, not a guaranteed outcome or turnaround. 18,17Company-reportedCompensation guide transparency pledges and market-activity list. Not observed live placements.

Small businesses can start a workers’ compensation quote online or through an insurance agent; agencies use a separate partner portal. 34,33,35Company-reportedWorkers’ compensation access for small businesses and agencies; other product pages direct buyers to quote or contact flows but do not describe the same process.

Have your ZIP, payroll and class-code details ready for a Pie workers’ compensation quote; its online intake begins with ZIP code. 38,35Company-reportedUnauthenticated first step and Pie’s description of workers’ compensation quote inputs; no data was entered and the flow was not advanced.

Pie advertises a workers’ compensation quote in about three minutes, but this company estimate does not predict underwriting or binding time. 35,33Company-reportedWorkers’ compensation quote marketing; no timed independent quote test was performed.

Access to insurers

Marsh and MMA describe access to multiple insurers rather than a single issuing carrier for all business. MMA says it works with a wide variety of carriers. Stratus is a prior-submit exchange in which participating insurers evaluate each risk individually; the page does not name those insurers. Marsh’s compensation and transparency pages say Marsh or affiliates may receive insurer consulting compensation and may own equity interests in certain insurers or reinsurers, with a list on the transparency site. Victor, an affiliated MGU and wholesale broker, is described as accessing markets retail Marsh US cannot offer directly; that path is described for some programs and is not assumed for every placement. Ask for the issuing insurer, surplus-lines status and proposed forms on the quote. 23,5,17,18,19Not publicly disclosedNo verified carrier panel, ratings or admitted-status schedule. Amazon/Affinity producer language is program-specific.

Pie workers’ compensation is written by The Pie Insurance Company and affiliates; AM Best says all business moved to The Pie Insurance Company and Pie Casualty Insurance Company as of January 1, 2024. 37,54,55,56VerifiedPie’s workers’ compensation program; the actual declarations page controls the issuing insurer for a specific policy and state.

Pie Casualty has an A- (Excellent) financial-strength rating with Stable outlook from AM Best, affirmed April 24, 2026; this is an insurer-strength opinion, not a guarantee your claim will be covered. 54VerifiedPie Casualty Insurance Company and the consolidated Pie Insurance Group rating unit as identified in the disclosure report.

For Pie’s BOP, GL, professional liability or cyber, ask which insurer would issue the policy; Pie says outside partners underwrite these lines but its reviewed pages do not name current partners. 37,39,40,41,42Not publicly disclosedCurrent public BOP, cyber, general-liability and professional-liability/E&O pages; account-specific carrier access was not tested.

Claims assistance

Marsh’s Claims Management service describes acting as an advisor among the business, insurer and third-party administrator: preparing, presenting and negotiating claims. Its cyber claims-advocacy page says specialists review claims, support litigation management, develop proof of loss with forensic accountants and advocate with insurers. MMA similarly describes claims advocacy as a carrier liaison on cyber matters and as part of property and casualty service. These are descriptions of assistance. They do not establish that Marsh pays claims, that a claim will be covered, or that recovery amounts cited in marketing were independently checked. 10,9,24,27Company-reportedCompany-reported advocacy. The cyber page’s “recovering billions” language is not adopted as a verified performance statistic.

Report workplace injuries to Pie within 24 hours through its form, phone or email; Pie says a claims professional follows up and assesses coverage and benefits. 52Company-reportedPublished first-report process for Pie-serviced workers’ compensation claims; state notice rules and the issuing carrier’s policy still apply.

Ask who handles your state’s workers’ comp claim: Pie says it manages claims in 34 states and CorVel in five, a split not reconciled with its separate 40-state-plus-DC availability. 53,43,54Conflicting sourcesPublic allocation of workers’ compensation claim handling; the current handler for an individual policy should be taken from its state kit and claim instructions.

Updated . Spot, a product of Tools for Enlightenment, publishes this research and works in the commercial insurance market. The comparison applies the same criteria to both providers. Editorial policy. To suggest a correction, contact Spot with the page URL and supporting source.

Comparisons Related to Marsh vs Pie Insurance

  • Compare AIG’s insurer group with Marsh’s segmented brokerage and risk-advisory routes for a growing or complex business.

  • Compare AIG’s broader commercial insurer group with Pie’s direct and agency workers’ compensation route.

  • Marsh offers technology-sector advice and professional-liability placement; Alliance Risk's E&O review considers major contracts and customer concentration.

All Comparisons

Get Help With Insurance Buying and Renewals.

Get help buying coverage and managing renewals, with less paperwork for your team. Create your account and submit an insurance request online.

Talk to Spot