AIG vs
Beazley: How Do They Compare for Business Insurance?
AIG’s Surplus Lines section describes commercial solutions for small, middle-market and large enterprises; Beazley markets MediaTech to small technology and business-services firms and accepts placement through third-party platforms or email. The size statement does not establish an AIG product or insurer for a particular buyer.
An Overview of AIG and Beazley
AIG’s Surplus Lines section says its commercial solutions serve small, middle-market and large enterprises; Beazley’s MediaTech targets small technology and business-services companies. Those statements describe different levels of scope: a broad business-size range versus a named product audience. For a smaller software or services company, Beazley publishes a specific MediaTech placement route; ask an AIG broker which product, insurer and submission path fit the same risk. 3 16 17 4
The coverage table also lists an AIG Product Recall offer, but the cited flyer describes multinational cover for named segments; it does not establish an unrestricted U.S. standalone offer, issuer or account terms. Confirm that your product and territory fit the actual proposal. 12
What Stands Out About AIG and Beazley?
AIG at a Glance
- Brokers and agents can use AIG’s North America portal for loss runs, policy documents, applications and tools. 4Publicly listed North America broker/agent portal functions and U.S. producer appointment requests. Authenticated workflow and product-specific submission or binding steps were not reviewed.
- For certain property and casualty lines, insureds and brokers can report claims online and track adjuster assignment and closure, depending on country. 5AIG's stated IntelliRisk claim portal functions for named primary property/casualty lines. This does not describe every commercial line, claim outcome, or policy obligation.
Beazley at a Glance
- MediaTech combines technology E&O, media liability and cyber coverage. 16US small-business MediaTech marketing; maximum is advertised capacity, not a guaranteed quote.
- Execuguard lets eligible buyers choose separate or shared limits for executive risks. 25US Execuguard; no assertion every coverage is included in every quote.
AIG vs Beazley Coverage Lines Compared
A listing may be arranged through an insurer or partner. “Not listed” means we have no separate offering page for it; ask the provider whether it can quote the coverage and request the policy terms.
AIG and Beazley Coverage, Line by Line
Open what AIG and Beazley each publish for one coverage line.
Commercial Property Insurance
Crime Insurance
Cyber Insurance
D&O Insurance
Employment Practices Liability Insurance
Fidelity Bonds
Fiduciary Liability Insurance
General Liability Insurance
Hired and Non-Owned Auto Insurance
Management Liability Insurance
Media Liability Insurance
Product Liability Insurance
Product Recall Insurance
Professional Liability (E&O) Insurance
Representations and Warranties Insurance
Tech E&O Insurance
AIG and Beazley Review Scores for 2026
These averages can combine ratings for different products, locations, and customer groups, including approximate BBB grade conversions. Read each review for its sources, what it covers and how the score is calculated.
AIG Review Score
Review Score
2 rated sources
Customer ratings for AIG are low: Trustpilot shows 1.9 out of 5 from 252 reviews, and NerdWallet gives 2.5 stars and notes more claims complaints than expected. These pages cover many AIG products and countries, so they only loosely describe business insurance.
Read AIG reviewsBeazley Review Score
Review Score
1 rated source
Beazley’s available customer feedback is mixed, with a 2.8/5 WalletHub rating from 15 reviews. That small, mixed-product sample gives business buyers limited guidance.
Read Beazley reviewsKey Differences Between AIG and Beazley
Who the Published Route Serves
AIG’s Surplus Lines section says its commercial insurance solutions serve small, middle-market, and large enterprises. The same section separately describes Lexington Casualty as an experienced excess-and-surplus-lines casualty provider; it does not explicitly assign all three customer-size segments to Lexington Casualty. 3AIG’s published Surplus Lines section; customer-size statement and Lexington Casualty description are adjacent but not explicitly attributed to the same business. This does not establish a provider-wide customer focus or product-specific issuer.
Small technology and business-services companies can consider MediaTech; digital-health buyers can look at Virtual Care, while Beazley’s Life Sciences offering targets middle and large organizations. 16,28,29Product-specific audiences; funding stage is not an eligibility criterion established by these sources.
Beazley’s audience is tied to particular products: MediaTech for smaller technology and business-services firms, with separate audiences for digital health and life sciences. AIG’s cited size statement does not assign all three segments to Lexington Casualty or show which product would serve a specific company. Ask each producer to identify the product and eligibility criteria for your business rather than comparing the broad AIG statement with Beazley’s full company catalogue. 16 3
Submission and Claim Access
AIG lists a North America myAIG portal for brokers and agents to access loss runs, policy documents, applications, and tools, and a separate U.S. portal for producer appointment requests. The public pages do not establish that a business can complete an online purchase or bind coverage directly. 4Publicly listed North America broker/agent portal functions and U.S. producer appointment requests. Authenticated workflow and product-specific submission or binding steps were not reviewed.
Prepare company services, products, employee count, US and foreign revenue, financial statements and expected changes for a MediaTech application; Beazley accepts placement through third-party platforms or email, but submission is not acceptance or binding. 16,17Published small-business placement description and F00859 042022; no application submitted or binding time tested.
Beazley accepts MediaTech placement through third-party platforms or email and requests company, product, employee and revenue information; submitting is not acceptance or binding. AIG’s public portal page describes tools for brokers and agents, but does not show the authenticated submission or binding steps for a product. Ask what documents each producer needs and who can bind after underwriting. 17 4
AIG says insureds and brokers can report primary property or casualty claims online for Auto Liability, General Liability, Property, and Aerospace, attach documents, and track adjuster assignment and claim closure. AIG says options vary by line and country. 5AIG's stated IntelliRisk claim portal functions for named primary property/casualty lines. This does not describe every commercial line, claim outcome, or policy obligation.
Keep the policy’s own notice instructions handy: Beazley provides a notice-of-loss form and US claims email, but those channels do not promise handling quality or establish that a loss is covered. 23Public US notice channels; no claim submitted or outcomes independently assessed.
AIG describes online reporting and tracking for named primary property and casualty lines. Beazley publishes a notice-of-loss form and U.S. claims email; those channels do not promise handling quality or establish coverage. The buyer consequence is practical: save the correct contact for the policy and confirm reporting deadlines before a claim occurs. 5 23
Producer Compensation
AIG says its companies compensate brokers and independent agents with commissions set at policy purchase, renewal, placement, or servicing, and may also pay contingent compensation. Specific compensation varies; the disclosure directs buyers to their broker or agent for policy-specific information. 6AIG's disclosure for business placed by brokers and independent agents with U.S. AIG offices issuing policies in the United States and territories for specified lines; its ranges describe business written in 2024 and exclude stated categories. Not a statement of any buyer's commission or total insurance cost.
Request an itemized premium and broker compensation disclosure because reviewed MediaTech materials do not publish a buyer-specific price, commission rate or fee schedule. 16,17,21Scoped review of public MediaTech purchase materials, not all Beazley group compensation arrangements.
AIG’s disclosed commissions and possible contingent compensation are scoped to specified U.S. business written in 2024; Beazley’s reviewed MediaTech materials do not publish a buyer-specific price, commission rate or fee schedule. Neither disclosure determines your total cost. Ask the placing producer for any commission, service fee and buyer-paid charge attached to the quote. 6 16 17
What Should You Confirm in AIG and Beazley Quotes?
- What product and named insurer would AIG propose for your company, and does the product match the risk and state? The AIG size statement alone does not establish an issuer or eligibility. 2 3
- For Beazley MediaTech, which current policy form, limits, retention and reporting deadline would apply? The public application is not a quote or proof of acceptance. 17
- For each placement, who may bind it, what does the producer receive, and what commissions or fees apply to your account? 6 21
AIG vs Beazley Services Compared
What each provider says about the services you may need
Sources for AIG vs Beazley
Comparisons Related to AIG vs Beazley
Alliance Risk publishes technology-focused broker routes and quote preparation; AIG describes broader commercial segments and broker-facing policy tools.
AIG is an insurance group whose products use issuing affiliates; Amelia Risk describes a broker-led process for finding and comparing insurer quotes.
Compare AIG’s insurer group with Aon’s middle-market brokerage and commercial risk placement process.





