
Montana Contract-Frustration Coverage Guide
The 2025 Montana Code Annotated says delay or failure is excused to the extent caused by operation of law even if the contract stipulates otherwise, and by an irresistible superhuman cause or public enemies unless the parties expressly agree otherwise. A separate section says that when an excusing cause other than the creditor’s act prevents full performance, the debtor is entitled to a ratable share of the consideration based on the creditor’s actual benefit. A buyer should identify the specific legal prohibition, the contract’s governing law and how partial work/value and advance payments are allocated; these statutes do not decide policy coverage.
What Is Contract Frustration Insurance?
Contract frustration may fit your business when an international contract is exposed to political disruption or government action. If your main risk is a customer who cannot pay, compare trade-credit coverage instead. Read the national Contract frustration guide.
What to Watch for With Contract Frustration in Montana
Montana law separately names operation-of-law prevention
Section 28-1-1301 excuses delay or failure to perform to the extent operation of law prevents or delays performance, even where the contract says that this is not an excuse. The same subsection treats an irresistible superhuman cause and acts of public enemies differently: those excuse performance unless the parties expressly agree otherwise. Pin down which cause is alleged rather than treating all political events alike. 1
The statute addresses value exchanged when only part is performed
If an excusing cause other than the creditor’s act prevents full performance, §28-1-1303 ties the debtor’s share of consideration to the benefit the creditor actually received from partial performance. Buyers that have paid deposits or accepted stages of work should identify what benefit was received and how the contract allocates refunds, work in progress and remaining installments. 2
Check the governing law and the official code version
The legislature-hosted page identifies itself as the Montana Code Annotated 2025 and gives the sections’ enactment/amendment history; it also says the printed code controls if the online research text has an omission or error. Confirm the edition and governing-law clause before applying Montana’s default rules to an international contract. 1,2
Which Contract Frustration Providers Have Montana License Records?
No provider in our research has both a state license record and a listing for this coverage line. This does not establish that providers are unlicensed. Check the regulator’s license lookup and confirm availability with a provider when requesting a quote.
Who Regulates Insurance in Montana?

Montana Commissioner of Securities and Insurance
The Commissioner of Securities and Insurance regulates Montana insurers and producers and acts as a consumer advocate. The office accepts written or online complaints about insurers and insurance professionals. 3,4,5
Surplus-Lines Tax and Stamping Office in Montana
Reported tax rate. 2.75% of total premium (0.75% for legal professional liability) + 2.50% fire tax on applicable fire premium + 0.175% SLIP+ transaction fee on total premium 6,7,9,10
Montana requires an eligible surplus-lines insurer and a statutory placement path when it is the insured’s home state. Before placement, the producing producer must advise you that the insurer is unauthorized in Montana and is not subject to the same supervision as an authorized insurer, and that if the surplus-lines insurer becomes insolvent, Montana’s property-and-casualty guaranty fund will not pay losses under the surplus-lines coverage. Confirm the applicable placement route and tax and fee bases with the producer.
- Montana surplus-lines placement routes: When Montana is home state, §33-2-302 generally calls for an eligible insurer and evidence that the line or full amount is unavailable from authorized insurers (or, at renewal, has not become available). The evidence routes are a diligent search of at least three insurers actually writing that line in Montana (or the smaller actual market), the kind appearing on the current Approved Risk List, or natural-disaster multiperil coverage. The list names kinds and classes; it does not prove that a particular business or BOP qualifies. Section 302 separately waives search requirements for an authorized quote with a premium rate at least 10% above the eligible unauthorized quote, if commissioner-approved disclosure is provided; and for a qualifying exempt commercial purchaser (ECP), after disclosure that coverage may or may not be available from an authorized insurer that may provide greater protection with more regulatory oversight, followed by the purchaser’s later written request. Under §318, an ECP must employ or retain a qualified risk manager as defined in §319, have paid over $100,000 in nationwide commercial P&C premiums in the prior 12 months, and meet one additional §318(1)(c) criterion. Some financial thresholds adjust every five years. 9,10,8,12,15,16
- Check the fire-tax allocation on a commercial package: Section 33-2-311 generally requires the surplus-lines producer to collect and pay the tax when Montana is home state, subject to §33-2-323. For a single-state risk with Montana as home state, §33-2-323(4) requires submission to the Commissioner, who collects the tax. Ask the producer which filing and payment route applies. CSI’s July 2026 guide lists code 1005, Commercial Package (Property & Casualty), with a 50% presumptively reasonable allocation and a 1.25% effective fire-tax rate. Treat this as an example: verify the code and allocation used for the policy; do not assume every BOP is classified as code 1005. CSI’s current schedule sets annual tax due dates (quarterly tax payments are accepted) and separate quarterly SLIP+ transaction-fee deadlines. 11,14,13,17
Questions to Ask Before You Buy Contract Frustration in Montana
- Does the chosen governing law make Mont. Code Ann. §§28-1-1301 and 1303 applicable to this contract and this performance?
- What law, public-enemy act or irresistible cause actually delayed performance, and what part of the obligation did it prevent?
- What payments, delivered work or other benefit has each party received, and how does the agreement treat partial performance and refunds?
Contract Frustration Insurance in Montana: Frequently Asked Questions
Does Montana’s statute treat law-based delay the same as extraordinary events?
No. Section 28-1-1301 says operation of law excuses performance to the extent it prevents or delays it, even despite a contrary stipulation. It says an irresistible superhuman cause or act of public enemies excuses performance unless the parties expressly agreed otherwise. 1
Does §28-1-1303 promise a full refund after performance is prevented?
No. It describes a ratable share tied to the benefit the creditor actually received from performance completed before an excusing cause prevented full performance. The contract’s governing law, terms and facts still matter. 2
Contract Frustration Insurance Guides for Other States
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Other coverage in MontanaEvery coverage guide for Montana, plus the regulator and surplus-lines details.


