Beazley vs Marsh: How Do They Compare for Crime Insurance?

Marsh, through its financial and professional liability practice, places crime and says it has handled complex placements of about $10 million to $110 million; Beazley underwrites commercial crime and advertises limits up to $25 million.

Beazley advertises crime limits up to $25 million; Marsh describes placements up to $110 million and social-engineering cover above an existing program. 1,2,3

What Are the Key Differences Between Beazley and Marsh Crime Insurance?

Standalone Policy Versus Large Placement and Top-Up

Beazley offers Commercial Crime directly. Marsh places crime through its financial and professional liability practice and describes complex placements and social-engineering top-ups above existing programs. Choose Beazley if its standalone product fits; choose Marsh if you need a large placement or an added social-engineering layer. 1 2 3

Limit Figures on the Public Pages

Beazley advertises Commercial Crime limits of up to US $25,000,000. Marsh says its team has experience handling complex crime placements ranging from about $10 million to $110 million (also stated as £10 million to £100 million), but does not publish standard limits, retentions or premiums for a specific placement. 1 2

Ransomware Note and Infill

Marsh lists employee white-collar fraud, third-party fraud, collusion, hacking or computer-related crime, social-engineering fraud and tangible asset theft, and notes that crime policies usually exclude ransomware though most cover direct financial losses from funds stolen by hackers. It offers infill and top-up social-engineering cover in excess of a client’s existing program, and says definitions and extensions differ across insurers. Beazley lists employee theft, forgery, in-transit loss, computer fraud, client-property loss, credit-card fraud and fraudulent-instruction cover conditioned on out-of-band authentication. The reviewed pages do not name a Marsh crime insurer. 2 1

What Should You Confirm in Beazley and Marsh Crime Insurance Quotes?

  • Ask Marsh whether the placement is Marsh corporate or MMA and whether you need social-engineering infill above an existing tower. 2 3
  • Compare Beazley’s advertised $25 million maximum with the limit Marsh proposes, including any $10–$110 million complex-placement discussion. 1 2
  • Ask how ransomware and hacker-stolen funds would be treated on each form. 2 1
  • Get Marsh’s proposed carrier and Beazley’s bound agreements including any Social Engineering application. 2 1

Beazley vs Marsh Crime Insurance Compared

Beazley vs Marsh: Crime Insurance: documented features by provider

CriteriaBeazley Commercial CrimeMarsh Commercial Crime Insurance Brokerage
Limits and Retentions

Beazley advertises Commercial Crime limits of up to US $25,000,000. The page does not publish retentions, sub-limits by insuring agreement, or a minimum limit. 1Company-reported. Product-page headline limit figure; the page does not split the figure between Commercial Crime and Financial Fidelity Bonds.

Marsh says its team has experience handling complex crime placements ranging from about $10 million to $110 million (also stated in GBP as £10 million to £100 million elsewhere on the page), but does not publish standard limits, retentions or premiums for a specific placement. 2Company-reported. Commercial crime insurance page; a description of Marsh's placement experience range, not a quoted limit for any individual buyer.

How to Apply

Beazley lists a standalone Crime application, a Massachusetts-specific Crime application and a separate Social Engineering application among its Tools & Resources, distinct from the Financial Fidelity Bond application forms on the same page. 1Company-reported. Tools & Resources section of the product page; the page does not describe an online quote or self-service purchase flow.

You engage Marsh's crime specialists (Marsh corporate or MMA) directly to identify crime exposure and place coverage; the reviewed pages describe advisor-led placement rather than an online quote tool. 2,3Company-reported. Commercial crime insurance and MMA executive and professional liability pages.

Coverage Features

Beazley says Commercial Crime protects an organization from loss of money and securities caused by theft by its own employees, plus third-party-related losses such as forgery or alteration, on-premises and in-transit loss, money-order and counterfeit-currency fraud, computer fraud, client-property loss, credit-card fraud and related expense coverage. 1Company-reported. Product-page description of insuring agreements; exclusions, conditions and available sub-limits appear only in the issued policy.

Beazley says its Commercial Crime policy includes a fraudulent-instruction (social-engineering) insuring agreement covering losses from wire transfers made on instructions from someone posing as a vendor, client or authorized employee, and that this cover is conditioned on out-of-band authentication of payment instructions. 1Company-reported. Product-page description; Beazley says the out-of-band-authentication condition can be removed for insureds with documented controls and response plans, subject to an additional premium.

Marsh lists employee white-collar fraud (including fidelity losses from trusted employees), third-party fraud, collusion, hacking or computer-related crime, social engineering fraud, and tangible asset theft as risks a commercial crime policy can address. It notes that crime policies usually exclude ransomware, though most cover direct financial losses from funds stolen by hackers. 2Company-reported. Commercial crime insurance page; the page is Marsh's global/UK financial-professional-liability practice content and cites a UK-based crime leader, so figures and coverage descriptions may not reflect a US-specific program.

Role in This Line

Beazley underwrites Commercial Crime insurance for commercial companies. The same product page separately describes Financial Fidelity Bonds, a related but distinct product line for financial institutions. 1Company-reported. Crime and Fidelity product page; distinguishes the commercial-company product from the financial-institution fidelity bond described on the same page.

Marsh's financial and professional liability practice places commercial crime insurance; Marsh McLennan Agency (MMA), the middle-market subsidiary, also places crime coverage bundled with fidelity as part of its executive and professional liability practice. 2,3Company-reported. Marsh corporate commercial crime page and MMA executive and professional liability page.

Risk Services

Beazley says its underwriting and claims professionals for this line work side by side so that, when a claim arises, the original underwriting intent of the policy is respected. 1Company-reported. Company-stated internal process description; no independent claims-handling outcome data is provided.

Marsh says it provides insights on emerging crime risks, claim examples, market conditions and product education throughout renewal and placement, and offers infill and top-up social engineering cover in excess of a client's existing program. 2Company-reported. Commercial crime insurance page, Why Marsh section.

About Beazley and Marsh and Crime Insurance

Related Pages for Beazley vs Marsh Crime Insurance

Updated . Spot, a product of Tools for Enlightenment, publishes this research and works in the commercial insurance market. The comparison applies the same criteria to both providers. Editorial policy. To suggest a correction, contact Spot with the page URL and supporting source.

Get Help With Insurance Buying and Renewals.

Get help buying coverage and managing renewals, with less paperwork for your team. Create your account and submit an insurance request online.

Talk to Spot