Alliance Risk vs CFC Tech E&O Insurance

Alliance Risk specializes in placing Tech E&O coverage for technology companies that build, deploy or advise using software, describing itself as a specialist placement partner for this line rather than an underwriter. ²Company-reported. Tech E&O page opening description.

CFC's Technology product is a single package policy for technology companies that bundles errors & omissions liability, breach-of-contract cover, IP infringement and media liability, and cyber cover. ^4,5Company-reported. Technology product page and US product brochure; the policy as issued controls the exact scope for any one customer.

Alliance Risk's Tech E&O page does not name the carriers it places coverage with; it says it "markets your risk to carriers that specialize in technology E&O" without identifying one. ²Not publicly disclosed. Tech E&O page as read on 2026-09-23; the issuing insurer depends on the specific placement.

The Technology application form names only CFC Underwriting Limited, a UK entity authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, as the party administering the form. Neither the Technology product page nor the application discloses which specific insurer or Lloyd's syndicate capacity backs a given US Technology policy. ^7,6Not publicly disclosed. Technology application footer and the regulatory information page, both checked on 2026-09-23; CFC's US arm, CFC USA Inc., separately holds admitted producer licenses and E&S authorization in NY, TX, GA and CA, but that page does not tie a specific license to the Technology product.

Alliance Risk lists SaaS platforms, AI companies, IT consultants/system integrators/MSPs, software developers, data analytics and business-intelligence firms, IT staffing firms, and IT support/help-desk providers as the businesses that need Tech E&O. ²Company-reported. Tech E&O page, "Who Needs Tech E&O Insurance?" section.

CFC says the Technology product is suitable for start-ups, mid-size and multinational tech companies, without publishing a specific revenue or headcount cutoff on the product page. ⁴Company-reported. Technology product page introduction; actual eligibility for a given applicant depends on underwriting review of the application.

Alliance Risk describes Tech E&O as covering failure to perform or deliver, errors in deliverables (including AI outputs that are factually wrong or biased), unmet specifications, unintentional IP infringement, product failure and data loss caused by the company's own mistakes, while excluding intentional wrongdoing, bodily injury or property damage, and cyberattacks, which it says require separate cyber coverage. ²Company-reported. Tech E&O page, "What Tech E&O Insurance Covers" and "Does NOT Cover" sections and the E&O-vs-cyber comparison; the issued policy and declarations control actual terms.

CFC describes coverage for financial loss, bodily injury or property damage arising from a technology company's products and services, plus legal liability for breach of client contracts and IP infringement claims such as copyright and trademark disputes. ⁵Company-reported. Product brochure feature descriptions; exclusions and conditions are set by the policy wording, which was not reviewed.

The cyber portion of the policy includes network and privacy liability, business interruption, data rectification and recreation costs, extortion cover, and social engineering coverage, sitting inside the same Technology package rather than as a separate purchase. ⁵Company-reported. Product brochure 'Comprehensive cyber cover' section.

Alliance Risk describes typical Tech E&O limits ranging from $250K/$500K for a freelancer up to $2M/$3M+ for a SaaS company with many users, and cites $2,500 as a standard deductible for small firms. ²Company-reported. Tech E&O page, "How to Buy Tech E&O Insurance" and cost sections; illustrative ranges, not a specific quote.

CFC publishes a maximum errors & omissions/media/cyber limit of $10,000,000 and a maximum commercial general liability limit of $6,000,000 for this product, with a minimum deductible of $0. ⁵Company-reported. Brochure 'Limits and deductibles' table; the limit and deductible on an individual policy's declarations control.

Alliance Risk offers a no-charge review of an existing Tech E&O policy that identifies coverage gaps, retroactive-date issues and market alternatives, and says it typically delivers proposals within a few business days after reviewing a client's current program. ²Company-reported. Tech E&O page, "Get Your Tech E&O Risk Review" and "Policy Review" sections.

Policyholders get access to CFC's incident response service at a $0 deductible, sitting on a limit separate from the main policy limit, plus a free app with dark web monitoring, phishing simulations and network deep scanning. ⁵Company-reported. Brochure 'Market leading cyber incident response' and 'Response app highlights' sections; CFC calls its incident response team one of the largest in-house teams in the industry, a characterization not independently verified here.

For a Tech E&O quote, Alliance Risk asks for the services offered, annual revenue and employee count, the three largest client contracts including indemnification terms, current E&O and cyber coverage, five-year claims history, and client concentration among the top three clients. ²Company-reported. Tech E&O page, "What We Need for Your Quote" section.

The US Technology application asks for company revenue by year, funding-round history, subcontractor and hosting arrangements, and whether multi-factor authentication is enforced for remote network access and email; it is returned to your insurance broker. ^7,4Company-reported. Application form Sections 1, 2 and 4; CFC also lists Connect and named API partners as digital trading channels on the product page, which may bypass a paper application for some brokers.

The reviewed Tech E&O page describes the quote and policy-review process but does not describe a dedicated claims-reporting procedure or claims-advocacy service specific to a Tech E&O loss. ²Not found in reviewed sources. Tech E&O page as read on 2026-09-23.

Not described in the reviewed sources.