Marsh vs Newfront: How Do They Compare for Employment Practices Liability Insurance?

Marsh places EPL for employers of all sizes and identifies Global Leader and Workplace Harassment Liability policy add-ons. Newfront brokers EPLI for private companies from seed stage through IPO, with tailored growth guidance and integrated claims support.

Marsh suits established employers, with its own EPL endorsements for 250 to 4,000 and more than 4,000 employees. Newfront suits venture-backed companies from seed stage through IPO, with a client dashboard and claims negotiation across executive-risk lines. 1,3

What Are the Key Differences Between Marsh and Newfront Employment Practices Liability Insurance?

Headcount-Banded Programs vs Funding-Stage Brokerage

Marsh places EPLI with its own endorsements: Leaders Preferred for midsize companies with 250 to 4,000 employees and Global Leaders for large and multinational companies above 4,000. Marsh McLennan Agency (MMA) places EPL for middle-market clients. Newfront serves private companies from seed through every funding round and says it has worked with over 500 public companies, with no headcount threshold. Choose Marsh if you have 250 or more employees; choose Newfront if you are a venture-backed company still scaling. 1 2 3

Broad Allegation List vs Leadership-Focused Framing

Marsh says EPLI can respond to discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination, retaliation, failure to employ or promote, negligent evaluation and civil-rights claims from employees, applicants or third parties. Newfront frames EPLI as shielding directors and officers from discrimination and termination claims. If you need the company itself and third-party claims covered, ask Newfront to confirm it. 1 3

Dashboard and Claims Negotiation vs No Described Service Tools

Newfront offers 24/7 dashboard access to policies, certificates and billing, plus claims and coverage negotiation, starting with a consultation. Marsh’s EPL pages describe neither a client dashboard nor an online quote, so ask who services your policy after you buy. 3 1

What Should You Confirm in Marsh and Newfront Employment Practices Liability Insurance Quotes?

  • Under 250 employees, ask Marsh what form it would use; ask Newfront how it would place your headcount. 1 3
  • Ask both which insurer issues the policy; neither page names one. 1 3
  • Ask Newfront whether its placed form covers third-party claims. 1 3

Marsh vs Newfront Employment Practices Liability Insurance Compared

Marsh vs Newfront: Employment Practices Liability Insurance: documented features by provider

CriteriaMarsh Employment Practices Liability (EPLI) InsuranceNewfront Employment Practices Liability Insurance (EPLI)
Who It’s For

Marsh says employers of all sizes face potential EPL liability, but its named endorsements target companies by size band: over 4,000 employees for the Global Leaders Endorsement and 250 to 4,000 employees for the Leaders Preferred Endorsement. 1Company-reported. Marsh EPL page.

Newfront says it services private companies from seed round through every series of funding and has worked with over 500 publicly traded companies, without an EPLI-specific eligibility threshold. 3Company-reported. Here for the Long Run section; figures describe the executive-risk practice broadly, not EPLI specifically.

Coverage Features

Marsh says EPLI can respond to allegations including discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination, retaliation, failure to employ or promote, negligent evaluation, and violation of an employee's civil rights, brought by past, present or prospective employees or third parties. 1Company-reported. Marsh EPL page; illustrative policy description, not a specific policy form.

Marsh names two proprietary EPL endorsements: the Global Leaders Endorsement, built for large and multinational companies with more than 4,000 employees, and the Leaders Preferred Endorsement, for midsize companies with 250 to 4,000 employees. 1Company-reported. Marsh EPL page, Marsh's EPL services section.

Newfront lists Employment Practices Liability Insurance (EPLI) among its Executive Risk Key Coverages, and describes its management-liability work as "shielding D&Os from wrongful discrimination, termination, and other employment-related issues." 3Company-reported. Key Coverages list and Committed to Client Advocacy section; the quoted language frames EPLI around protecting leadership rather than describing named insuring agreements.

Role in This Line

Marsh's financial and professional liability practice places employment practices liability insurance (EPLI); MMA also places EPL coverage within its executive and professional liability practice for middle-market clients. 1,2Company-reported. Marsh EPL page and MMA executive and professional liability page.

Newfront's Executive Risk practice brokers EPLI coverage, negotiating placement for management-liability lines. Deirdre Finn, the Executive Risk Solutions Practice Leader, oversees the D&O, employment-practices and fiduciary book of business. 3Company-reported. Executive Risk offering page and Leadership section.

About Marsh and Newfront and Employment Practices Liability Insurance

Related Pages for Marsh vs Newfront Employment Practices Liability

Updated . Spot, a product of Tools for Enlightenment, publishes this research and works in the commercial insurance market. The comparison applies the same criteria to both providers. Editorial policy. To suggest a correction, contact Spot with the page URL and supporting source.

Get Help With Insurance Buying and Renewals.

Get help buying coverage and managing renewals, with less paperwork for your team. Create your account and submit an insurance request online.

Talk to Spot