Marsh vs USI Insurance Services: How Do They Compare for Employment Practices Liability Insurance?

Marsh places EPL for employers of all sizes and names Global Leader and Workplace Harassment Liability policy add-ons. USI Insurance Services brokers EPL for small and midsize businesses and offers workplace risk-management services.

Marsh brings its own EPL endorsements, Leaders Preferred and Global Leaders, to employers with 250 to over 4,000 staff; USI places EPL for small and mid-sized janitorial, staffing, maintenance and printing firms and reviews policies you already have for gaps. 1,3,4

What Are the Key Differences Between Marsh and USI Insurance Services Employment Practices Liability Insurance?

250-Plus Employers vs Small Business-Services Firms

Both are brokers and neither names an EPL insurer. Marsh places EPLI with its own endorsements, Leaders Preferred and Global Leaders, built for employers with 250 to 4,000 and more than 4,000 employees; its MMA arm handles middle-market executive liability. USI lists EPL for building maintenance, repair, janitorial, staffing and printing companies, and its ExecuSafe team reviews existing EPL for small and mid-sized businesses. Choose Marsh if you have 250 or more employees and want broker-negotiated wording; choose USI if you are a smaller janitorial, staffing or maintenance firm or want your current policy audited. 1 2 3 4

Published Claim List vs Reviews and Claim Advocacy

Marsh lists the allegations its placements answer: discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination, retaliation, failure to employ or promote, negligent evaluation and civil-rights violations, including claims from third parties. USI lists no coverage terms but offers classification and exposure reviews, contract review and claim advocacy. Marsh tells you more about scope before quoting; USI tells you more about the help you get. 1 3 4

What Should You Confirm in Marsh and USI Insurance Services Employment Practices Liability Insurance Quotes?

  • Ask Marsh which endorsement matches your headcount and what it adds to the base form. 1 3 4
  • If you already have EPL, ask USI for an ExecuSafe gap check and ask Marsh whether its endorsement would close those gaps. 4 1
  • Ask both which insurer issues the policy and what limits you get. 1 3
  • Check that USI’s placed form covers third-party claims, which Marsh lists. 1 3

Marsh vs USI Insurance Services Employment Practices Liability Compared

Marsh vs USI Insurance Services: Employment Practices Liability Insurance: documented features by provider

CriteriaMarsh Employment Practices Liability (EPLI) InsuranceUSI Employment Practices Liability Brokerage
Who It’s For

Marsh says employers of all sizes face potential EPL liability, but its named endorsements target companies by size band: over 4,000 employees for the Global Leaders Endorsement and 250 to 4,000 employees for the Leaders Preferred Endorsement. 1Company-reported. Marsh EPL page.

USI's Business Services practice, which lists EPL, targets building and maintenance, repair service, janitorial, staffing and printing companies; its ExecuSafe review targets small- and medium-sized businesses generally. 3,4Company-reported. Company description of client segments for each source.

Coverage Features

Marsh says EPLI can respond to allegations including discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination, retaliation, failure to employ or promote, negligent evaluation, and violation of an employee's civil rights, brought by past, present or prospective employees or third parties. 1Company-reported. Marsh EPL page; illustrative policy description, not a specific policy form.

Marsh names two proprietary EPL endorsements: the Global Leaders Endorsement, built for large and multinational companies with more than 4,000 employees, and the Leaders Preferred Endorsement, for midsize companies with 250 to 4,000 employees. 1Company-reported. Marsh EPL page, Marsh's EPL services section.

USI lists employment practices liability among the coverages it places for business-services clients, and its ExecuSafe review looks for gaps in a client's existing EPL coverage as part of a broader management liability check. 3,4Company-reported. Catalogue listing plus the ExecuSafe review description; actual insuring agreements and exclusions are set by the issued policy.

Role in This Line

Marsh's financial and professional liability practice places employment practices liability insurance (EPLI); MMA also places EPL coverage within its executive and professional liability practice for middle-market clients. 1,2Company-reported. Marsh EPL page and MMA executive and professional liability page.

USI brokers employment practices liability (EPL) coverage, which responds to claims like wrongful termination, discrimination or harassment; it places EPL individually or reviews it as part of a management liability program under ExecuSafe. 3,4Company-reported. Business Services catalogue and ExecuSafe article.

About Marsh and USI Insurance Services

Related Pages for Marsh vs USI Insurance Services

Updated . Spot, a product of Tools for Enlightenment, publishes this research and works in the commercial insurance market. The comparison applies the same criteria to both providers. Editorial policy. To suggest a correction, contact Spot with the page URL and supporting source.

Get Help With Insurance Buying and Renewals.

Get help buying coverage and managing renewals, with less paperwork for your team. Create your account and submit an insurance request online.

Talk to Spot