Marsh vs THREE by Berkshire Hathaway: How Do They Compare for Employment Practices Liability Insurance?

Marsh's financial and professional liability practice places employment practices liability insurance (EPLI); MMA also places EPL coverage within its executive and professional liability practice for middle-market clients. ^5,6Company-reported. Marsh EPL page and MMA executive and professional liability page.

THREE presents Employment Practices Liability as a component of its combined Business Owners Policy rather than identifying it as a separate standalone policy on the reviewed product page. ⁹Company-reported. Company-described U.S. package structure. The page does not establish underwriting terms or that every listed category will be included for every applicant.

The reviewed pages do not name a specific EPLI insurer; the named endorsements appear to be Marsh-negotiated policy features rather than a Marsh-underwritten product. ^5,6Not publicly disclosed. Marsh EPL page and MMA executive and professional liability page as read on 2026-09-23.

The linked sample policy's declarations identify Berkshire Hathaway Direct Insurance Company as issuer. ⁸Company-reported. This is the issuer named on the public sample only; the sample does not establish the issuing entity for every state-specific quote or buyer's issued policy.

Marsh says employers of all sizes face potential EPL liability, but its named endorsements target companies by size band: over 4,000 employees for the Global Leaders Endorsement and 250 to 4,000 employees for the Leaders Preferred Endorsement. ⁵Company-reported. Marsh EPL page.

The reviewed product page does not state separate eligibility rules for Employment Practices Liability; the general quote and advisor route is not proof that a particular business qualifies for it. ^9,7Not publicly disclosed. Eligibility and state availability remain unestablished for an individual risk until THREE returns its quote and applicable forms.

Marsh says EPLI can respond to allegations including discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination, retaliation, failure to employ or promote, negligent evaluation, and violation of an employee's civil rights, brought by past, present or prospective employees or third parties. ⁵Company-reported. Marsh EPL page; illustrative policy description, not a specific policy form.

Marsh names two proprietary EPL endorsements: the Global Leaders Endorsement, built for large and multinational companies with more than 4,000 employees, and the Leaders Preferred Endorsement, for midsize companies with 250 to 4,000 employees. ⁵Company-reported. Marsh EPL page, Marsh's EPL services section.

THREE's Business Owners Policy page lists Employment Practices Liability among its marketed coverage categories in the combined policy. This describes the product page, not whether the category appears in a particular quote or responds to a loss. ^9,8Company-reported. Official THREE package marketing for Employment Practices Liability. The sample policy is state-selectable and does not establish that this item is included in every quote or issued policy.

Confirm in your quote.

The reviewed public product page does not state a separate limit or deductible for Employment Practices Liability; THREE says the quote-specific insurance summary lists limits and deductibles. ^9,8Not publicly disclosed. No number is inferred from the sample policy. The quote and issued declarations control the buyer-specific limit and deductible.

Confirm in your quote.

THREE directs small-business prospects to an online quote and says licensed Small Business Advisors can help with the process. ⁷Company-reported. This is the route for the overall THREE product. It does not show whether Employment Practices Liability will be offered for a particular business or whether a customer can bind that line without an issued policy.