Founder Shield vs Marsh: How Do They Compare for Cyber Insurance?

Marsh offers advisor-led placement and over $200 million of excess cyber capacity per client through Cyber ECHO; Founder Shield places cyber with A- rated carriers for healthcare, finance, SaaS and e-commerce.

Marsh's Cyber ECHO excess facility can provide over $200 million of cyber capacity per client, with a free first reinstatement. Founder Shield places Founder Shield Cyber Liability Insurance only with carriers rated A- or better and does not publish a tower size. 5,3,4

What Are the Key Differences Between Founder Shield and Marsh Cyber Insurance?

Nine-Figure Excess Versus an A- Primary Screen

Marsh says Cyber ECHO can provide over $200 million of cyber capacity per client, with a free first reinstatement and a paid second reinstatement for separate events in a policy year. Founder Shield places cyber only with carriers rated A- or better and does not publish limits. If a customer or board asked for a large excess tower, Marsh is the documented number. If you need a primary placement with a rating floor, Founder Shield is. Choose Marsh if you need more than $200 million of excess cyber capacity; choose Founder Shield if you want an A- screen on the paper that would sit primary. 5 3

MMA Claims Advocacy Versus Typical Exclusions

Marsh McLennan Agency places cyber for middle-market clients and acts as a carrier liaison with claims advocacy. Marsh's specialists review claims, support litigation management and work with forensic accountants on proof of loss. Founder Shield instead flags typical exclusions: stolen-IP value, internal upgrades and possible future lost profits. One page is about who fights the claim. The other is about what may never be covered. 7 6 1

How You Engage Each Firm

You engage a named Marsh or MMA cyber specialist. You request Founder Shield cyber through its website or an advisor. Neither page describes a self-serve bind. 4 2

What Should You Confirm in Founder Shield and Marsh Cyber Insurance Quotes?

  • Ask Marsh which insurer would issue primary and Cyber ECHO layers. 5
  • Ask Founder Shield which A-rated carrier it approached. 3
  • Ask Marsh whether MMA or the global practice would run the account. 7

Founder Shield vs Marsh Cyber Insurance Compared

Founder Shield vs Marsh: Cyber Insurance: documented features by provider

CriteriaFounder Shield Cyber Liability InsuranceMarsh Cyber Insurance Brokerage
Who It’s For

Founder Shield calls cyber coverage a priority for healthcare, financial services, SaaS and e-commerce companies, citing their exposure to data breaches and business interruption. 1Company-reported. Cyber Liability product page.

MMA says any company can benefit from cyber coverage, but prioritizes organizations that store significant customer data, run large customer databases or hold valuable digital assets. 7Company-reported. MMA cyber solutions FAQ; MMA describes its own client base as middle-market organizations generally.

How to Apply

You request Founder Shield Cyber Liability Insurance through Founder Shield's website or an insurance advisor rather than binding coverage directly; Founder Shield says its placement team then approaches carriers on the client's behalf. 2,3Company-reported. About-us and carrier-selection pages describe the general placement process, not a line-specific application form.

You engage a named Marsh or MMA cyber specialist to design a placement; the reviewed pages describe advisor-led placement and risk analytics rather than an online self-serve quote. 4,7Company-reported. Marsh and MMA cyber pages, which list dedicated cyber brokerage and placement leaders.

Coverage Features

Founder Shield lists loss or damage to electronic data, income loss and extra expense from a system outage, cyber extortion payments, and breach-notification and reputation-management costs as the branches of cyber coverage it places. 1Company-reported. Product page; the issued policy and declarations control actual coverage.

Founder Shield says cyber policies typically exclude loss of value from stolen IP, internal technology system upgrades, and possible future lost profits. 1Company-reported. Product page; specific exclusions depend on the issued policy.

MMA lists incident investigation and response costs, network interruption/extra expense, extortion and ransomware payments, data restoration, and security and privacy liability as core cyber coverages, with media liability, privacy regulatory defense and reputation-based income loss available as additional coverages. 7Company-reported. MMA cyber solutions page; actual policy wording and insurer vary by placement.

Role in This Line

Founder Shield is a retail insurance brokerage, described on its site as “the innovation arm of The Baldwin Group,” and places Founder Shield Cyber Liability Insurance with third-party carriers rather than underwriting the policy itself. 2Company-reported. About-us page; applies to Founder Shield's brokerage model generally, restated here for this line.

Marsh's cyber risk practice places and advises on cyber insurance brokerage; it does not underwrite the policies it places. 4Company-reported. Marsh corporate cyber insurance product page.

Marsh McLennan Agency (MMA), Marsh's middle-market subsidiary, places cyber coverage and acts as a carrier liaison, combining placement with claims advocacy. 7Company-reported. MMA cyber solutions page.

About Founder Shield and Marsh and Cyber Insurance

Related Pages for Founder Shield vs Marsh Cyber Insurance

Updated . Spot, a product of Tools for Enlightenment, publishes this research and works in the commercial insurance market. The comparison applies the same criteria to both providers. Editorial policy. To suggest a correction, contact Spot with the page URL and supporting source.

Get Help With Insurance Buying and Renewals.

Get help buying coverage and managing renewals, with less paperwork for your team. Create your account and submit an insurance request online.

Talk to Spot