CFC vs Marsh: How Do They Compare for Employment Practices Liability Insurance?

CFC's EPL product has a stated California eligibility limit; Marsh describes workplace-allegation coverage and includes two policy add-ons.

CFC sells EPL only inside its US Management Liability package and turns away public and California-domiciled companies; Marsh is a broker whose Leaders Preferred and Global Leaders EPL endorsements are built for 250 to 4,000 and 4,000-plus employees. 1,5

What Are the Key Differences Between CFC and Marsh Employment Practices Liability Insurance?

Package-Only Insurer vs Broker With Large-Employer Endorsements

CFC writes EPL only inside its US Management Liability package and lists standalone EPL among declined risks, so you must buy the wider package to get it. Marsh is a broker that places EPLI and names two endorsements: Leaders Preferred for 250 to 4,000 employees and Global Leaders for more than 4,000. Those bands describe the named endorsements, not every Marsh placement. Choose Marsh if you have 250 or more employees or are a public company; consider CFC if you're a private company outside California that wants EPL bundled with other management cover. 1 5 6

Public and California Companies Are Out at CFC

CFC's brochure lists US publicly traded companies and California-domiciled businesses among declined risks for the package that carries its EPL. If either describes you, CFC can't quote you and Marsh is the only option of the two. 1 5

What Should You Confirm in CFC and Marsh Employment Practices Liability Insurance Quotes?

  • If you're a US public company, ask Marsh which endorsement and insurer would apply. 5 1
  • Ask Marsh whether you fall under Global Leaders, Leaders Preferred or another form at your headcount. 5
  • Ask Marsh whether it can place standalone EPL, which CFC won't sell. 5 1
  • Get wage-and-hour and third-party terms on both quotes. 1 5

CFC vs Marsh Employment Practices Liability Insurance Compared

CFC vs Marsh: Employment Practices Liability Insurance: documented features by provider

CriteriaCFC Employment Practices LiabilityMarsh Employment Practices Liability (EPLI) Insurance
Who It’s For

CFC's brochure lists California-domiciled business and US publicly traded companies among the risks it declines for the package that carries this EPL coverage. 1Company-reported. Brochure's 'What we decline' list; underwriting still applies to any individual business.

Marsh says employers of all sizes face potential EPL liability, but its named endorsements target companies by size band: over 4,000 employees for the Global Leaders Endorsement and 250 to 4,000 employees for the Leaders Preferred Endorsement. 5Company-reported. Marsh EPL page.

Coverage Features

CFC says its employment practices liability section gives cover to the entity, directors, officers, management personnel and employees for claims brought by employees or third parties. 1Company-reported. Brochure's 'Employment practices liability' description; the issued policy wording determines who and what is actually covered.

CFC says it can include cover for wage and hour violations, immigration investigations, and costs following a workplace violence event as part of employment practices liability. 1Company-reported. Brochure's 'Employment practices liability' description and 'What else is in the policy?' list; availability of each extension depends on underwriting.

Marsh says EPLI can respond to allegations including discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination, retaliation, failure to employ or promote, negligent evaluation, and violation of an employee's civil rights, brought by past, present or prospective employees or third parties. 5Company-reported. Marsh EPL page; illustrative policy description, not a specific policy form.

Marsh names two proprietary EPL endorsements: the Global Leaders Endorsement, built for large and multinational companies with more than 4,000 employees, and the Leaders Preferred Endorsement, for midsize companies with 250 to 4,000 employees. 5Company-reported. Marsh EPL page, Marsh's EPL services section.

Role in This Line

CFC includes employment practices liability only inside its US Management Liability package. Its brochure lists 'standalone EPL' among the risks it declines, so a business cannot buy this coverage from CFC on its own. 1Company-reported. Brochure's 'What we decline' list, which pairs standalone EPL with California-domiciled business as declined risks.

Marsh's financial and professional liability practice places employment practices liability insurance (EPLI); MMA also places EPL coverage within its executive and professional liability practice for middle-market clients. 5,6Company-reported. Marsh EPL page and MMA executive and professional liability page.

About CFC and Marsh and Employment Practices Liability Insurance

Related Pages for CFC vs Marsh Employment Practices Liability

Updated . Spot, a product of Tools for Enlightenment, publishes this research and works in the commercial insurance market. The comparison applies the same criteria to both providers. Editorial policy. To suggest a correction, contact Spot with the page URL and supporting source.

Get Help With Insurance Buying and Renewals.

Get help buying coverage and managing renewals, with less paperwork for your team. Create your account and submit an insurance request online.

Talk to Spot