At-Bay vs
Resilience: How Do They Compare for Business Insurance?
Resilience publishes US Tech E&O appetite from $25 million to $10 billion in revenue; At-Bay has separate technology product and platform parameters.
An Overview of At-Bay and Resilience
A US technology buyer should compare size and service model: Resilience publishes Tech E&O appetite from $25 million to $10 billion in revenue, while At-Bay pairs technology coverage with Stance services. 17 2 7 15 Choose Resilience if your revenue falls within its range and you want insurance separate from security services; choose At-Bay if you want Stance guidance tied to its technology cover.
What Stands Out About At-Bay and Resilience?
At-Bay at a Glance
- Combine technology E&O and cyber protection in one policy. 2Product highlights, not an issued policy or universal contract coverage.
- Eligible policyholders get monitoring, training and cyber-advisor access; managed detection and response costs extra. 7Current service descriptions and footnotes; no claims of effectiveness or independent testing.
Resilience at a Glance
- Technology companies can seek E&O coverage for software, hardware and technology services. 17Technology-specific professional liability; not general professional E&O or a guarantee of offered limits.
- Resilience helps prioritize financial cyber risks and track exposure across entities. 21,22Current named cybersecurity products; outcomes not independently established.
At-Bay vs Resilience Coverage Lines Compared
A listing may be arranged through an insurer or partner. “Not listed” means we have no separate offering page for it; ask the provider whether it can quote the coverage and request the policy terms.
At-Bay and Resilience Coverage, Line by Line
Open what At-Bay and Resilience each publish for one coverage line.
Cyber Insurance
Tech E&O Insurance
At-Bay and Resilience Reliability Scores
Each score uses the criteria for that provider’s role. Providers with more than one role may have a score for each.
At-Bay Reliability Scores
Resilience Reliability Scores
At-Bay and Resilience Review Scores for 2026
These averages can combine ratings for different products, locations, and customer groups, including approximate BBB grade conversions. Read each review for its sources, what it covers and how the score is calculated.
At-Bay Review Score
Review Score
2 rated sources
At-Bay’s public review evidence is thin: one old G2 review and a BBB complaint record. It is not enough to judge day-to-day service or claims handling.
Read At-Bay reviewsResilience Review Score
Review Score
1 rated source
There's almost nothing public to go on. G2 shows 4.5 out of 5 for Resilience, but from a single review.
Read Resilience reviewsKey Differences Between At-Bay and Resilience
Product Appetite Comes Before a Limit Comparison
Resilience describes technology E&O limits separately from its cyber primary and excess offering. At-Bay also distinguishes product limits from what its broker platform can handle. Ask which route will underwrite the account and whether the proposed limit combines or separates professional and cyber losses. A headline maximum is not an offer to this company. 17 16 2
The Security Work Is Not Identical
At-Bay describes Stance guidance and controls, plus separately purchased endpoint, email and other MDR options. Resilience’s Edge materials emphasize financial risk prioritization, while Arc addresses multi-entity risk management. These service descriptions suggest different operational questions: who monitors systems, who prioritizes spending, and who aggregates exposure across entities? Confirm actual deliverables rather than treating the services as substitutes by name. 7 21 22
Separate Service Contracts Can Change the Total Purchase
Resilience states that insurance is not tied to purchasing its security services. At-Bay distinguishes its policy-linked fee from optional MDR and recognizes comparable qualifying security solutions for certain credits. A company with an existing security vendor should ask what it must buy, what it may retain and which credits actually apply. 15 23 7
What Should You Confirm in At-Bay and Resilience Insurance Quotes?
Request activity and revenue acceptance, policy forms, issuing insurer and California route. Resilience’s named US insurers do not settle the California allocation in the reviewed public documentation, and At-Bay’s historic carrier announcement is likewise insufficient. Include service fees, renewal responsibilities and incident reporting in the written comparison. 15 11 19 8
At-Bay vs Resilience Services Compared
What each provider says about the services you may need
Sources for At-Bay vs Resilience
Comparisons Related to At-Bay vs Resilience
At-Bay publishes cyber, technology E&O and professional-liability routes with security services; AIG lists broader commercial products and broker tools.
Compare AIG’s commercial insurance offerings with Resilience’s cyber insurance and separate cybersecurity services.
At-Bay's technology E&O discusses service-credit claims and separate Stance security services; Alliance Risk reviews technology contracts and existing coverage.




